Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 1;274(2):290-297.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004725.

Postoperative Work and Activity Restrictions After Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review

Michele M Loor  1 , Puja Shah  2 , Oscar A Olavarria  2 , Naila Dhanani  2 , Michael G Franz  3   4 , Barbara W Trautner  1   5   6 , Mike K Liang  7
Affiliations

Postoperative Work and Activity Restrictions After Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review

Michele M Loor et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review aims to assess what is known about convalescence following abdominal surgery. Through a review of the basic science and clinical literature, we explored the effect of physical activity on the healing fascia and the optimal timing for postoperative activity.

Background: Abdominal surgery confers a 30% risk of incisional hernia development. To mitigate this, surgeons often impose postoperative activity restrictions. However, it is unclear whether this is effective or potentially harmful in preventing hernias.

Methods: We conducted 2 separate systematic reviews using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The first assessed available basic science literature on fascial healing. The second assessed available clinical literature on activity after abdominal surgery.

Results: Seven articles met inclusion criteria for the basic science review and 22 for the clinical studies review. The basic science data demonstrated variability in maximal tensile strength and time for fascial healing, in part due to differences in layer of abdominal wall measured. Some animal studies indicated a positive effect of physical activity on the healing wound. Most clinical studies were qualitative, with only 3 randomized controlled trials on this topic. Variability was reported on clinician recommendations, time to return to activity, and factors that influence return to activity. Interventions designed to shorten convalescence demonstrated improvements only in patient-reported symptoms. None reported an association between activity and complications, such as incisional hernia.

Conclusions: This systematic review identified gaps in our understanding of what is best for patients recovering from abdominal surgery. Randomized controlled trials are crucial in safely optimizing the recovery period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Carney MJ, Weissler JM, Fox JP, et al. Trends in open abdominal surgery in the United States-Observations from 9,950,759 discharges using the 2009-2013 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) datasets. Am J Surg 2017; 214:287–292.
    1. Rahbari NN, Knebel P, Diener MK, et al. Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery - is there any consensus? BMC Surg 2009; 9:8.
    1. Shubinets V, Fox JP, Lanni MA, et al. Incisional hernia in the United States: trends in hospital encounters and corresponding healthcare charges. Am Surg 2018; 84:118–125.
    1. Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, et al. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 2012; 16:179–183.
    1. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 2004; 240:578–583. discussion 583–575.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources