Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 1;42(3):408-413.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002940.

Failure and Revision Surgery After Cochlear Implantation in the Adult Population: A 10-year Single-institution Retrospective and Systematic Review of the Literature

Affiliations

Failure and Revision Surgery After Cochlear Implantation in the Adult Population: A 10-year Single-institution Retrospective and Systematic Review of the Literature

Eleanor Layfield et al. Otol Neurotol. .

Abstract

Objective: To characterize failure rate and etiology after cochlear implantation; to identify predictors and describe outcomes after implant failure.

Study design: Retrospective chart review and systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Embase.

Setting: Academic Cochlear Implant Center.

Subject population: Four hundred ninety-eight devices in 439 distinct adult patients.

Interventions: Unilateral or bilateral cochlear implantation.

Main outcome measures: Implant failure rate and etiology.

Results: A total of 32 devices (5.9%) failed in 31 patients encompassing the following failure types in accordance with the European Consensus Statement of Cochlear Implants: 17 device failures (53.1%), 11 failures due to performance decrement/adverse reactions (34.4%), and 4 medical reasons (12.9%). There was no significant difference in age, sex, or manufacturer between patients with and without failures. Twenty-five percent of patients with failure leading to explantation had childhood onset of deafness compared to 12.1% of patients with adult-onset hearing loss (OR = 2.42; p = 0.04). Performance decrement/adverse reaction patients had an older average age at implantation compared to device failure patients (mean 68.5 yr 95% CI: 59.9-77.1 vs mean 47.6 yr, CI: 39.9-55.3, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in time to failure, sex, or device manufacturer between the different types of failures. Twenty-nine patients who experienced CI failure underwent a revision surgery, while the remaining two opted for explantation without reimplantation. One patient who underwent revision surgery subsequently presented with a second failure and underwent a second revision, which was successful.In our systematic review, 815 citations were reviewed, and 9 studies were selected for inclusion. Overall failure rate across all studies was 5.5%. Device failure was the leading cause of failure in the majority (6/9) of studies, accounting for 40.8% of all failures. Medical reasons were the second leading cause at 33.6%, followed by performance decrement/adverse reaction (20.9%) and other (4.8%).

Conclusions: Cochlear implant failure is a rare phenomenon. Childhood-onset of hearing loss appears to be associated with an increased risk of overall failure. Older patients are at increased risk for performance decrement/adverse reaction. Revision surgery success rates remain very high and patients with failure of any cause should be offered explantation with concurrent reimplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors disclose no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Fakurnejad S, Vail D, Song Y, Alyono J, Blevins NH. Trends in age of cochlear implant recipients, and the impact on perioperative complication rates. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:438–443.
    1. Sunde J, Webb JB, Moore PC, Gluth MB, Dornhoffer JL. Cochlear implant failure, revision, and reimplantation. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34:1670–1674.
    1. Buchman CA, Higgins CA, Cullen R, et al. Revision cochlear implant surgery in adult patients with suspected device malfunction. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25:504–510.
    1. O’Donoghue G. European consensus statement on cochlear implant failures and explantations. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26:1097–1099.
    1. Côté M, Ferron P, Bergeron F, Bussières R. Cochlear reimplantation: Causes of failure, outcomes, and audiologic performance. Laryngoscope 2007; 117:1225–1235.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources