Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 4;6(6):677-693.
doi: 10.1002/osp4.450. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Validated methods for identifying individuals with obesity in health care administrative databases: A systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Validated methods for identifying individuals with obesity in health care administrative databases: A systematic review

Sékou Samadoulougou et al. Obes Sci Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Health care administrative databases are increasingly used for health studies and public health surveillance. Cases of individuals with obesity are selected using case-identification methods. However, the validity of these methods is fragmentary and particularly challenging for obesity case identification.

Objective: The objectives of this systematic review are to (1) determine the case-identification methods used to identify individuals with obesity in health care administrative databases and (2) to summarize the validity of these case-identification methods when compared with a reference standard.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in six bibliographic databases for the period January 1980 to June 2019 for all studies evaluating obesity case-identification methods compared with a reference standard.

Results: Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes were the only case-identification method utilized in selected articles. The performance of obesity-identification methods varied widely across studies, with positive predictive value ranging from 19% to 100% while sensitivity ranged from 3% to 92%. The sensitivity of these methods was usually low while the specificity was higher.

Conclusion: When obesity is reported in health care administrative databases, it is usually correctly reported; however, obesity tends to be highly underreported in databases. Therefore, case-identification methods to monitor the prevalence and incidence of obesity within health care administrative databases are not reliable. In contrast, the use of these methods remains relevant for the selection of individuals with obesity for cohort studies, particularly when identifying cohorts of individuals with severe obesity or cohorts where obesity is associated with comorbidities.

Keywords: algorithm; case‐identification; databases; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest was declared.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of study selection and review

References

    1. Blais C, Jean S, Sirois C, et al. Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System (QICDSS), an innovative approach. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2014;34:226‐235. - PubMed
    1. Koné Péfoyo AJ, Rivard M, Laurier C. Public health surveillance and role of administrative data. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2009;57:99‐111. 10.1016/j.respe.2008.11.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schneeweiss S, Avorn J. A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:323‐337. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamm NC, Pelletier L, Ellison J, et al. Trends in chronic disease incidence rates from the Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2019;39:216‐224. 10.24095/hpcdp.39.6/7.02 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lix LM, Yogendran MS, Shaw SY, Burchill C, Metge C, Bond R. Population‐based data sources for chronic disease surveillance. Chronic Dis Can. 2008;29:31‐38. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources