Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2020 Dec 20:2020.12.18.20248336.
doi: 10.1101/2020.12.18.20248336.

Real-world data suggest antibody positivity to SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a decreased risk of future infection

Affiliations

Real-world data suggest antibody positivity to SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a decreased risk of future infection

Raymond A Harvey et al. medRxiv. .

Update in

  • Association of SARS-CoV-2 Seropositive Antibody Test With Risk of Future Infection.
    Harvey RA, Rassen JA, Kabelac CA, Turenne W, Leonard S, Klesh R, Meyer WA 3rd, Kaufman HW, Anderson S, Cohen O, Petkov VI, Cronin KA, Van Dyke AL, Lowy DR, Sharpless NE, Penberthy LT. Harvey RA, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 May 1;181(5):672-679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0366. JAMA Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33625463 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Importance There is limited evidence regarding whether the presence of serum antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a decreased risk of future infection. Understanding susceptibility to infection and the role of immune memory is important for identifying at-risk populations and could have implications for vaccine deployment. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate subsequent evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on diagnostic nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) among individuals who are antibody-positive compared with those who are antibody-negative, using real-world data. Design This was an observational descriptive cohort study. Participants The study utilized a national sample to create cohorts from a de-identified dataset composed of commercial laboratory test results, open and closed medical and pharmacy claims, electronic health records, hospital billing (chargemaster) data, and payer enrollment files from the United States. Patients were indexed as antibody-positive or antibody-negative according to their first SARS-CoV-2 antibody test recorded in the database. Patients with more than 1 antibody test on the index date where results were discordant were excluded. Main Outcomes/Measures Primary endpoints were index antibody test results and post-index diagnostic NAAT results, with infection defined as a positive diagnostic test post-index, as measured in 30-day intervals (0-30, 31-60, 61-90, >90 days). Additional measures included demographic, geographic, and clinical characteristics at the time of the index antibody test, such as recorded signs and symptoms or prior evidence of COVID-19 (diagnoses or NAAT+) and recorded comorbidities. Results We included 3,257,478 unique patients with an index antibody test. Of these, 2,876,773 (88.3%) had a negative index antibody result, 378,606 (11.6%) had a positive index antibody result, and 2,099 (0.1%) had an inconclusive index antibody result. Patients with a negative antibody test were somewhat older at index than those with a positive result (mean of 48 versus 44 years). A fraction (18.4%) of individuals who were initially seropositive converted to seronegative over the follow up period. During the follow-up periods, the ratio (CI) of positive NAAT results among individuals who had a positive antibody test at index versus those with a negative antibody test at index was 2.85 (2.73 - 2.97) at 0-30 days, 0.67 (0.6 - 0.74) at 31-60 days, 0.29 (0.24 - 0.35) at 61-90 days), and 0.10 (0.05 - 0.19) at >90 days. Conclusions Patients who display positive antibody tests are initially more likely to have a positive NAAT, consistent with prolonged RNA shedding, but over time become markedly less likely to have a positive NAAT. This result suggests seropositivity using commercially available assays is associated with protection from infection. The duration of protection is unknown and may wane over time; this parameter will need to be addressed in a study with extended duration of follow up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Diagram of study design.
This figure shows the key elements of the study design. The study index date for each patient was the day of the patient’s first observed SARS-CoV-2 antibody test on or after January 8, 2020. Follow-up occurred in 30-day increments after the index date.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Subsequent antibody testing among index antibody positive patients over time (n = 378,606)
This figure shows the results of subsequent antibody tests among the group of patients with an initial positive antibody test. Over the four time periods, blue bars represent those who subsequently test negative for antibodies, while red bars show those who subsequently test positive. The blue line shows the percentage of patients who subsequently tested negative in each time period.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Subsequent Diagnostic (NAAT) Test Results at 30 Day Intervals
This figure shows the results of diagnostic (NAAT) testing after initial antibody testing. Over each time period, the red bars show those who test positive for the diagnostic test among those who initially tested positive for antibodies. The blue bars show those who test positive for the diagnostic test among those who initially tested negative for antibodies. The black line shows the ratio of positive diagnostic tests among those who initially tested positive for antibodies versus those who initially tested negative.

References

    1. Stadlbauer D, Tan J, Jiang K, et al. Repeated cross-sectional sero-monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in New York City. Nature. Published online 2020:1–7. - PubMed
    1. Wajnberg A, Amanat F, Firpo A, et al. Robust neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection persist for months. Science. Published online October 28, 2020:eabd7728. doi:10.1126/science.abd7728 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gudbjartsson DF, Norddahl GL, Melsted P, et al. Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(18):1724–1734. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Long Q-X, Tang X-J, Shi Q-L, et al. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat Med. 2020;26(8):1200–1204. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0965-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ward H, Atchison CJ, Whitaker M, et al. Antibody prevalence for SARS-CoV-2 in England following first peak of the pandemic: REACT2 study in 100,000 adults. medRxiv. Published online January 1, 2020:2020.08.12.20173690. doi:10.1101/2020.08.12.20173690 - DOI

Publication types