Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33355262
- PMCID: PMC7751217
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003621
Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Cash transfer (CT) programmes are implemented widely to alleviate poverty and provide safety nets to vulnerable households with children. However, evidence on the effects of CTs on child health and nutrition outcomes has been mixed. We systematically reviewed evidence of the impact of CTs on child nutritional status and selected proximate determinants.
Methods: We searched articles published between January 1997 and September 2018 using Agris, Econlit, Eldis, IBSS, IDEAS, IFPRI, Google Scholar, PubMed and World Bank databases. We included studies using quantitative impact evaluation methods of CTs with sample sizes over 300, targeted to households with children under 5 years old conducted in countries with gross domestic product per capita below US$10 000 at baseline. We conducted meta-analysis using random-effects models to assess the impact of CT programmes on selected child nutrition outcomes and meta-regression analysis to examine the association of programme characteristics with effect sizes.
Results: Out of 2862 articles identified, 74 articles were eligible for inclusion. We find that CTs have significant effects of 0.03±0.03 on height-for-age z-scores (p<0.03) and a decrease of 2.1% in stunting (95% CI -3.5% to -0.7%); consumption of animal-source foods (4.5%, 95% CI 2.9% to 6.0%); dietary diversity (0.73, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.19) and diarrhoea incidence (-2.7%, 95% CI -5.4% to -0.0%; p<0.05). The effects of CTs on weight-for-age z-scores and wasting were not significant (0.02, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.08; p<0.42) and (1.2%, 95% CI: -0.1% to 2.5%; p<0.07), respectively. We found that specific programme characteristics differentially modified the effect on the nutrition outcomes studied.
Conclusion: We found that CT programmes targeted to households with young children improved linear growth and contributed to reduced stunting. We found that the likely pathways were through increased dietary diversity, including through the increased consumption of animal-source foods and reduced incidence of diarrhoea. With heightened interest in nutrition-responsive social protection programmes to improve child nutrition, we make recommendations to inform the design and implementation of future programmes.
Keywords: child health; health policy; systematic review.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization, the World Bank Group Levels and trends in child malnutrition. Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates, 2020.
-
- Development Initiatives 2020 global nutrition report: action on equity to end malnutrition. Bristol, UK: Development Initiatives, 2020.
-
- FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020. transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets. Rome: FAO, 2020. 10.4060/ca9692en - DOI
-
- Ivaschenko O. The state of social safety nets. world bank, 2018. Available: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/29115/9781464...
-
- Gentilini U, Almenfi M, Orton I, et al. Social protection and jobs responses to COVID-19, 2020. Available: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/590531592231143435/pdf/Social...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials