Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study
- PMID: 33355273
- PMCID: PMC7759115
- DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200055
Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study
Abstract
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have widely replaced warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Our objective was to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the Canadian setting.
Methods: We conducted a population-based observational multicentre cohort study with propensity score matching and subsequent meta-analysis. We used health care databases from 7 Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia). Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated anticoagulation therapy in 2009-2017 were matched to an equal number who initiated warfarin. The primary outcome was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for ischemic stroke or systemic embolization. Secondary outcomes included pooled HRs for major bleeding; a composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolization, major bleeding and all-cause mortality; and myocardial infarction. We modelled HRs using proportional hazard Cox regression with inverse probability of censoring weights, and estimated pooled HRs with random-effect meta-analyses.
Results: We included 128 273 patients who initiated anticoagulation with a DOAC (40 503 dabigatran, 49 498 rivaroxaban and 38 272 apixaban) and 128 273 patients who initiated anticoagulation with warfarin. The pooled HR for ischemic stroke or systemic embolization comparing DOACs to warfarin was 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87 to 1.19). Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with lower rates of major bleeding (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.97), the composite outcome (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89) and all-cause mortality (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.85).
Interpretation: In this real-world study, DOACs were associated with similar risks of ischemic stroke or systemic embolization, and lower risks of bleeding and total mortality compared to warfarin. These findings support the use of DOACs for anticoagulation in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT03596502.
Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Min Jun has received unrestricted grant support from VentureWise, a wholly owned subsidiary of NPS MedicineWise funded by AstraZeneca. No other competing interests were declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Anticoagulants in Adults with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Concomitant Coronary/Peripheral Artery Disease.Am J Med. 2018 Sep;131(9):1075-1085.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 26. Am J Med. 2018. PMID: 29807001
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):2933-2944. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020232. Stroke. 2018. PMID: 30571400 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and Safety in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Who Switched from Warfarin to Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Medicare Population.Adv Ther. 2025 Mar;42(3):1462-1483. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03099-y. Epub 2025 Jan 30. Adv Ther. 2025. PMID: 39883308 Free PMC article.
-
Real-World Setting Comparison of Nonvitamin-K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin-K Antagonists for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2494-2503. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017549. Epub 2017 Jul 17. Stroke. 2017. PMID: 28716982
-
Direct comparative effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;34(2):173-190. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0415-7. Epub 2018 Jun 8. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 29948370
Cited by
-
Oral anticoagulant switching in patients with atrial fibrillation: a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;13(4):e071907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071907. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37185198 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study in primary healthcare in Catalonia.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 15;14:1237454. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1237454. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37781690 Free PMC article.
-
More early bleeds associated with high baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study.Blood Adv. 2024 Sep 24;8(18):4913-4923. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013126. Blood Adv. 2024. PMID: 38842448 Free PMC article.
-
Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: A narrative review of current evidence and emerging strategies.Eur J Clin Invest. 2025 Sep;55(9):e70082. doi: 10.1111/eci.70082. Epub 2025 Jun 7. Eur J Clin Invest. 2025. PMID: 40481780 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2025 May 30;10:e78-e88. doi: 10.5114/amsad/205549. eCollection 2025. Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2025. PMID: 40620744 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Atrial fibrillation. Ottawa: Heart and Stroke Foundation; [accessed 2020 Dec. 10]. Available: www.heartandstroke.ca/heart-disease/conditions/atrial-fibrillation.
-
- Verma A, Cairns JA, Mitchell LB, et al. CCS Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Committee. 2014 focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1114–30. - PubMed
-
- National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK) Atrial fibrillation: the management of atrial fibrillation. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014. - PubMed
-
- January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140:e125–51. - PubMed
-
- Andrade JG, Verma A, Mitchell LB, et al. 2018 focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:1371–92. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical