Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Dec 18;8(4):E877-E886.
doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200055. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study

Madeleine Durand et al. CMAJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have widely replaced warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Our objective was to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the Canadian setting.

Methods: We conducted a population-based observational multicentre cohort study with propensity score matching and subsequent meta-analysis. We used health care databases from 7 Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia). Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated anticoagulation therapy in 2009-2017 were matched to an equal number who initiated warfarin. The primary outcome was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for ischemic stroke or systemic embolization. Secondary outcomes included pooled HRs for major bleeding; a composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolization, major bleeding and all-cause mortality; and myocardial infarction. We modelled HRs using proportional hazard Cox regression with inverse probability of censoring weights, and estimated pooled HRs with random-effect meta-analyses.

Results: We included 128 273 patients who initiated anticoagulation with a DOAC (40 503 dabigatran, 49 498 rivaroxaban and 38 272 apixaban) and 128 273 patients who initiated anticoagulation with warfarin. The pooled HR for ischemic stroke or systemic embolization comparing DOACs to warfarin was 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87 to 1.19). Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with lower rates of major bleeding (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.97), the composite outcome (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89) and all-cause mortality (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.85).

Interpretation: In this real-world study, DOACs were associated with similar risks of ischemic stroke or systemic embolization, and lower risks of bleeding and total mortality compared to warfarin. These findings support the use of DOACs for anticoagulation in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT03596502.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Min Jun has received unrestricted grant support from VentureWise, a wholly owned subsidiary of NPS MedicineWise funded by AstraZeneca. No other competing interests were declared.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flow diagram showing inclusion of patients into the base cohort. Numbers do not add up exactly owing to suppression of small cells for confidentiality reasons. Note: DOAC = direct oral anticoagulant. *Less than 66 years for sites with comprehensive drug claim data only for older adults (Ontario, Nova Scotia).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke or systemic embolization, major bleeding, and the composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolization, major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Note: CI = confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atrial fibrillation. Ottawa: Heart and Stroke Foundation; [accessed 2020 Dec. 10]. Available: www.heartandstroke.ca/heart-disease/conditions/atrial-fibrillation.
    1. Verma A, Cairns JA, Mitchell LB, et al. CCS Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Committee. 2014 focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1114–30. - PubMed
    1. National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK) Atrial fibrillation: the management of atrial fibrillation. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014. - PubMed
    1. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140:e125–51. - PubMed
    1. Andrade JG, Verma A, Mitchell LB, et al. 2018 focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:1371–92. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data

Grants and funding