Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 11;104(3):684-694.
doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaa228.

Male-derived copulatory plugs enhance implantation success in female Mus musculus

Affiliations

Male-derived copulatory plugs enhance implantation success in female Mus musculus

Michael Lough-Stevens et al. Biol Reprod. .

Abstract

Among a wide diversity of sexually reproducing species, male ejaculates coagulate to form what has been termed a copulatory plug. A number of functions have been attributed to copulatory plugs, including the inhibition of female remating and the promotion of ejaculate movement. Here we demonstrate that copulatory plugs also influence the likelihood of implantation, which occurs roughly 4 days after copulation in mice. Using a bead transfer method to control for differences in ejaculate retention and fertilization rates, we show that implantation rates significantly drop among females mated to genetically engineered males incapable of forming plugs (because they lack functional transglutaminase 4, the main enzyme responsible for its formation). Surprisingly, this result does not correlate with differences in circulating progesterone levels among females, an important hormone involved in implantation. We discuss three models that connect male-derived copulatory plugs to implantation success, including the hypothesis that plugs contribute to a threshold amount of stimulation required for females to become receptive to implantation.

Keywords: bead transfer method; copulatory plug; implantation; progesterone; pseudopregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Permutation based χ2 test demonstrates that females receiving an ejaculate from TGM4−/− (KO) males are significantly less likely to implant than females mating to TGM4+/+ (WT) males.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplot of progesterone levels estimated across 98 females from five different groups; Mated vs. Unmated indicates whether ejaculation was scored within 4 h of pairing. All male mates were vasectomized. WT = females paired with a TGM4+/+ male, KO = females paired with a TGM4−/− males. Control = females never paired with males. Numbers in parentheses indicate number of females per group. Gray hash marks indicate individual observations. Vertical line separates the two different groups (homogeneous within each group) identified with Tukey HSD tests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schneider MR, Mangels R, Dean MD. The molecular basis and reproductive function(s) of copulatory plugs. Mol Reprod Dev 2016; 83:755–767. - PubMed
    1. Voss R. Male accessory glands and the evolution of copulatory plugs in rodents. Occas Pap Mus Zool Univ Mich 1979; 689:1–27.
    1. Martan J, Shepherd BA. The role of the copulatory plug in reproduction of the guinea pig. J Exp Zool 1976; 196:79–83. - PubMed
    1. Mangels R, Tsung K, Kwan K, Dean MD. Copulatory plugs inhibit the reproductive success of rival males. J Evol Biol 2016; 29:2289–2296. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dixson AL, Anderson MJ. Sexual selection, seminal coagulation and copulatory plug formation in primates. Folia Primatol 2002; 73:63–69. - PubMed