Successful Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Cervical Myelopathy : Related Factors and the Effect of Increased Stimulation Intensity
- PMID: 33355842
- PMCID: PMC7819792
- DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0111
Successful Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Cervical Myelopathy : Related Factors and the Effect of Increased Stimulation Intensity
Abstract
Objective: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been widely used during spine surgery to reduce or prevent neurologic deficits, however, its application to the surgical management for cervical myelopathy remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the success rate of IONM in patients with cervical myelopathy and to investigate the factors associated with successful baseline monitoring and the effect of increasing the stimulation intensity by focusing on motor evoked potentials (MEPs).
Methods: The data of 88 patients who underwent surgery for cervical myelopathy with IONM between January 2016 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The success rate of baseline MEP monitoring at the initial stimulation of 400 V was investigated. In unmonitorable cases, the stimulation intensity was increased to 999 V, and the success rate final MEP monitoring was reinvestigated. In addition, factors related to the success rate of baseline MEP monitoring were investigated using independent t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, chi-squared test, and Fisher's exact probability test for statistical analysis. The factors included age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, symptom duration, Torg-Pavlov ratio, space available for the cord (SAC), cord compression ratio (CCR), intramedullary increased signal intensity (SI) on magnetic resonance imaging, SI length, SI ratio, the Medical Research Council (MRC) grade, the preoperative modified Nurick grade and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score.
Results: The overall success rate for reliable MEP response was 52.3% after increasing the stimulation intensity. No complications were observed to be associated with increased intensity. The factors related to the success rate of final MEP monitoring were found to be SAC (p<0.001), CCR (p<0.001), MRC grade (p<0.001), preoperative modified Nurick grade (p<0.001), and JOA score (p<0.001). The cut-off score for successful MEP monitoring was 5.67 mm for SAC, 47.33% for the CCR, 3 points for MRC grade, 2 points for the modified Nurick grade, and 12 points for the JOA score.
Conclusion: Increasing the stimulation intensity could significantly improve the success rate of baseline MEP monitoring for unmonitorable cases at the initial stimulation in cervical myelopathy. In particular, the SAC, CCR, MRC grade, preoperative Nurick grade and JOA score may be considered as the more important related factors associated with the success rate of MEP monitoring. Therefore, the degree of preoperative neurological functional deficits and the presence of spinal cord compression on imaging could be used as new detailed criteria for the application of IONM in patients with cervical myelopathy.
Keywords: Cervical myelopathy; Evoked potentials, Motor; Stimulation intensity; Success rate.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Electrophysiological assessments of the motor pathway in diabetic patients with compressive cervical myelopathy.J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec;23(6):707-14. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE141060. Epub 2015 Sep 4. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015. PMID: 26340381
-
Intramedullary high signal intensity and neurological status as prognostic factors in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Oct;152(10):1687-94. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0692-8. Epub 2010 May 29. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010. PMID: 20512384
-
Patient Factors Impacting Baseline Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery for Myelopathy or Radiculopathy.Clin Spine Surg. 2022 Jul 1;35(6):E527-E533. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001299. Epub 2022 Feb 28. Clin Spine Surg. 2022. PMID: 35221326
-
Does three-grade classification of T2-weighted increased signal intensity reflect the severity of myelopathy and surgical outcomes in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Jun;43(3):967-976. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01106-3. Epub 2019 May 3. Neurosurg Rev. 2020. PMID: 31053986
-
Intraoperative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring in spinal tumor surgery: sirens or indispensable tools?Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Aug;41(2):E18. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16141. Neurosurg Focus. 2016. PMID: 27476842 Review.
Cited by
-
Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials as a Predictive Modality for Postoperative Deficit in Cervical Spine Decompression Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global Spine J. 2024 Jun;14(5):1609-1628. doi: 10.1177/21925682231219224. Epub 2023 Dec 4. Global Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38047537 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Feasibility of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for extramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery in elderly patients.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Aug;165(8):2089-2099. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05682-8. Epub 2023 Jun 24. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023. PMID: 37355475 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Cervical Spine Surgery: Indications, Challenges, and Advances.J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 13;12(14):4652. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144652. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37510767 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: History, Physical Examination, and Diagnosis.J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 25;13(23):7139. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237139. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39685599 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Appel S, Biron T, Goldstein K, Ashkenazi E. Effect of intra- and extraoperative factors on the efficacy of intraoperative neuromonitoring during cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2019;123:e646–e651. - PubMed
-
- Avadhani A, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP. Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J. 2010;10:475–485. - PubMed
-
- Ayoub C, Zreik T, Sawaya R, Domloj N, Sabbagh A, Skaf G. Significance and cost-effectiveness of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in cervical spine surgery. Neurol India. 2010;58:424–428. - PubMed
-
- Benuska J, Plisova M, Zabka M, Horvath J, Tisovsky P, Novorolsky K. The influence of anesthesia on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgeries. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2019;120:794–801. - PubMed
-
- Bose B, Sestokas AK, Schwartz DM. Neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during instrumented anterior cervical fusion. Spine J. 2004;4:202–207. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources