The gap prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle (GPIAS) paradigm to assess auditory temporal processing: Monaural versus binaural presentation
- PMID: 33355931
- DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13755
The gap prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle (GPIAS) paradigm to assess auditory temporal processing: Monaural versus binaural presentation
Abstract
The Gap Prepulse Inhibition of the Acoustic Startle Reflex (GPIAS) is a paradigm used to assess auditory temporal processing in both animals and humans. It consists of the presentation of a silent gap embedded in noise and presented a few milliseconds before a startle sound. The silent gap produces the inhibition of the startle reflex, a phenomenon called gap-prepulse inhibition (GPI). This paradigm is also used to detect tinnitus in animal models. The lack of inhibition by the silent gaps is suggested to be indicative of the presence of tinnitus "filling-in" the gaps. The current research aims at improving the GPIAS technique by comparing the GPI produced by monaural versus binaural silent gaps in 29 normal-hearing subjects. Two gap durations (5 or 50 ms), each embedded in two different frequency backgrounds (centered around 500 or 4 kHz). Both low- and high- frequency narrowband noises had a bandwidth of half an octave. Overall, the startle magnitude was greater for the binaural versus the monaural presentation, which might reflect binaural loudness summation. In addition, the GPI was similar between the monaural and the binaural presentations for the high-frequency background noise. However, the GPI was greater for the low-frequency background noise for the binaural, compared to the monaural, presentation. These findings suggest that monaural GPIAS might be more suited to detect tinnitus compared to the binaural presentation.
Keywords: EMG; acoustic startle reflex; binaural; gap-Prepulse inhibition of the Acoustic startle reflex (GPIAS); monaural; prepulse inhibition; temporal processing; tinnitus.
© 2020 Society for Psychophysiological Research.
Similar articles
-
Optimization of the Operant Silent Gap-in-Noise Detection Paradigm in Humans.J Integr Neurosci. 2024 Sep 29;23(10):183. doi: 10.31083/j.jin2310183. J Integr Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39473155 Free PMC article.
-
The gap-startle paradigm to assess auditory temporal processing: Bridging animal and human research.Psychophysiology. 2016 May;53(5):759-66. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12620. Epub 2016 Feb 3. Psychophysiology. 2016. PMID: 26841102 Clinical Trial.
-
A Mouse Model of Tinnitus Using Gap Prepulse Inhibition of the Acoustic Startle in an Accelerated Hearing Loss Strain.Otol Neurotol. 2020 Apr;41(4):e516-e525. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002573. Otol Neurotol. 2020. PMID: 32176148
-
Auditory gating processes and binaural inhibition in the inferior colliculus.Hear Res. 2002 Jun;168(1-2):98-109. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00356-8. Hear Res. 2002. PMID: 12117513 Review.
-
Does Tinnitus Fill in the Gap Using Electrophysiology? A Scoping Review.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020 Aug;53(4):563-582. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Apr 23. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020. PMID: 32334868
Cited by
-
Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over Prefrontal Cortex in a Guinea Pig Model Ameliorates Tinnitus.Front Neurosci. 2021 Jul 22;15:693935. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.693935. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34366777 Free PMC article.
-
Objective Detection of Tinnitus Based on Electrophysiology.Brain Sci. 2022 Aug 16;12(8):1086. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081086. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 36009149 Free PMC article. Review.
-
From hidden hearing loss to supranormal auditory processing by neurotrophin 3-mediated modulation of inner hair cell synapse density.PLoS Biol. 2024 Jun 27;22(6):e3002665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002665. eCollection 2024 Jun. PLoS Biol. 2024. PMID: 38935589 Free PMC article.
-
Optimization of the Operant Silent Gap-in-Noise Detection Paradigm in Humans.J Integr Neurosci. 2024 Sep 29;23(10):183. doi: 10.31083/j.jin2310183. J Integr Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39473155 Free PMC article.
-
Prepulse inhibition predicts subjective hearing in rats.Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 23;11(1):18902. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98167-6. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34556706 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Allen, P. D., Schmuck, N., Ison, J. R., & Walton, J. P. (2008). Kv1.1 channel subunits are not necessary for high temporal acuity in behavioral and electrophysiological gap detection. Hearing Research, 246(1-2), 52-58.
-
- Barsz, K., Ison, J. R., Snell, K. B., & Walton, J. P. (2002). Behavioral and neural measures of auditory temporal acuity in aging humans and mice. Neurobiology of Aging, 23(4), 565-578.
-
- Basavaraj, S., & Yan, J. (2012). Prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle reflex as a function of the frequency difference between prepulse and background sounds in mice. PLoS One, 7(9), e45123. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045123
-
- Blumenthal, T. D. (1995). Prepulse inhibition of the startle eyeblink as an indicator of temporal summation. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(4), 487-494. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213074
-
- Blumenthal, T. D., Avendano, A., & Berg, W. K. (1987). The startle response and auditory temporal summation in neonates. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 44(1), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(87)90022-1
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous