Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Jan-Dec:19:1534735420983472.
doi: 10.1177/1534735420983472.

A Prospective Outcomes Pilot Evaluation of Inspire Now: A Program for People with Lung Cancer

Ellen Conte  1   2 , Mark Legacy  1 , Athanasios Psihogios  1   2 , Anne Pitman  1 , Andrea Redway  1 , Jill Hamer-Wilson  1 , Dugald Seely  1   2
Affiliations
Observational Study

A Prospective Outcomes Pilot Evaluation of Inspire Now: A Program for People with Lung Cancer

Ellen Conte et al. Integr Cancer Ther. 2020 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in Canada, yet patients are often under-supported. A six-week program called Inspire Now, created to address unmet supportive care needs, was evaluated in this study. Feasibility and preliminary outcomes were assessed in order to inform future changes to the program.

Objectives: (1) Assess the feasibility of the program and its evaluation; (2) pilot the collection of patient-reported outcomes; (3) identify outcomes that may be positively influenced; and (4) inform program modifications.

Methods: Participants were recruited from the first session of Inspire Now for an observational pilot study. The primary outcome was feasibility. Secondary outcomes included within-person changes in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung (FACT-L) and Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW), and program satisfaction and qualitative experiences of participants and facilitators through internally-developed questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Analysis was primarily descriptive, within person changes in FACT-L and MYCaW were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and qualitative data was assessed for common themes.

Results: The program and its evaluation were feasible; 8 of 9 (89%) participants consented to the study, median attendance was 6 of 6 sessions (IQR 4.5-6), and questionnaire completion was 100% at baseline and 75% at follow-up. There were clinically meaningful improvements in MYCaW concern 1 (-1.2, 95% CI -2.0 to -0.4) and overall wellbeing (-0.9, 95% CI -2.1 to 0.4). Seven of eight FACT-L sub-sections trended toward improvement, with absolute changes ranging from -1.7 to 10.8%. Participant feedback was overwhelmingly positive; group support and social interactions were highly valued.

Conclusions: The group intervention for people with lung cancer was feasible to both run and evaluate. Participants responded positively to the program. Findings will inform changes to future sessions and an analysis of multiple sessions is planned.

Keywords: group support; integrative medicine; lung cancer; mind body medicine; psychosocial oncology; supportive care; yoga.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394-424. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer Statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225-249. - PubMed
    1. Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory C. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2017. Canadian Cancer Society; 2017.
    1. Giuliani ME, Milne RA, Puts M, et al. The prevalence and nature of supportive care needs in lung cancer patients. Curr Oncol. 2016;23:258-265. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coronado AC, Finley C, Badovinac K, Han J, Niu J, Rahal R. Discrepancies between Canadian cancer research funding and site-specific cancer burden: a spotlight on ten disease sites. Curr Oncol. 2018;25:338-341. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types