Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Dec;6(14):1773-1782.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

Initial Experience, Safety, and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Affiliations
Free article
Multicenter Study

Initial Experience, Safety, and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Santosh K Padala et al. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of conduction system pacing by performing left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).

Background: There are limited data from single centers showing that LBBAP may circumvent the technical and electrophysiological challenges encountered with His bundle pacing.

Methods: Patients referred for pacemaker implantation at 2 centers between February 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020, were considered for LBBAP. LBBAP was performed by implanting a lumen-less, exposed helix lead approximately 2 cm distal to the His bundle and deep into the septum using a specialized delivery sheath. Implant success rates, complications, and electrophysiological parameters were assessed.

Results: LBBAP was successful in 305 of 341 patients (89%). Mean age was 72 ± 12 years; 45% were women; and 39% had QRS duration (QRSd) >130 ms, 22% right bundle branch block, 11% left bundle branch block, and 6% intraventricular conduction defect. Pacing indications were sinus node dysfunction in 28.7%, atrioventricular block in 52.5%, cardiac resynchronization therapy in 8.8%, and refractory atrial fibrillation in 10% of patients. Procedural duration was 74.7 ± 34 min and fluoroscopic time was 10.4 ± 8.1 min. The mean baseline QRSd and paced QRSd in the overall cohort was 114 ± 29.8 ms versus 112 ± 11.7 ms (p < 0.001) and in patients with infra-Hisian disease was 144.5 ± 19 ms versus 115 ± 12 ms (p < 0.001), respectively. Mean left ventricular activation time was 71.7 ± 11 ms at high output and 74.7 ± 11 ms at low output. LBB potentials were noted in 41% patients. Pacing threshold and R waves were 0.74 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms and 10.7 ± 4.9 mV at time of implantation and were stable at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. The only major complications were 3 LBBAP lead dislodgements, 2 within 24 h and 1 at 2 weeks.

Conclusions: LBBA pacing is safe, feasible, and a reliable alternative to His bundle pacing for providing physiological pacing. Randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of LBBAP.

Keywords: His bundle pacing; conduction system pacing; left bundle branch area pacing; physiological pacing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Disclosures Dr. Padala has served as a consultant for Medtronic. Dr. Koneru has received teaching honoraria from Medtronic and Biotronik; and has received fellowship support from Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Medtronic, and Abbott Medical. Dr. Ellenbogen has served as a consultant and Data and Safety Monitoring Board chair for Medtronic; and honoraria and research support from Medtronic. Dr. Verma has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, and Servier; and has received grant support from Bayer and Biotronik. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources