Differential induction of Shiga toxin in environmental Escherichia coli O145:H28 strains carrying the same genotype as the outbreak strains
- PMID: 33360585
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.109029
Differential induction of Shiga toxin in environmental Escherichia coli O145:H28 strains carrying the same genotype as the outbreak strains
Abstract
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O145 is a major serotype associated with severe human disease. Production of Shiga toxins (Stxs), especially Stx2a, is thought to be correlated with STEC virulence. Since stx genes are located in prophages genomes, induction of prophages is required for effective Stxs production. Here, we investigated the production of Stxs in 12 environmental STEC O145:H28 strains under stresses STEC encounter in natural habitats and performed comparative analysis with two O145:H28 clinical strains, one linked to a 2010 U.S. lettuce-associated outbreak (RM13514) and the other linked to a 2007 Belgium ice cream-associated outbreak (RM13516). Similar to the outbreak strains, all environmental strains belong to Sequence Type (ST)-78 using the EcMLST typing scheme. Although all Stx1a-prophages were grouped together, variations in Stx1a production were observed prior to or following the inductions. Among all stx2a positive environmental strains, only the Stx2a-prophage in cattle isolate RM9154-C1 was clustered with the Stx2a-prophages in RM13514, the Stx2a-phage induced from a STEC O104:H4 strain linked to the 2011 outbreak of enterohemorrhagic infection in Germany, and the Stx2a-prophage in STEC O157:H7 strain EDL933, a prototype of enterohemorrhagic E. coli. Furthermore, the Stx2a-prophage in RM9154-C1 shared the same chromosomal insertion site and carried the same antiterminator Q gene and the late promoter PR' as the Stx2a-prophage in RM13514. Following mitomycin C or enrofloxacin treatment, the production of Stx2a in RM9154-C1 was the highest among all environmental strains tested. In contrast, following acid challenge and recovery, the production of Stx2a in RM9154-C1 was the lowest among all the environmental strains tested, at a level comparable to the clinical strains. A significant increase in Stx2a production was detected in all strains when exposed to H2O2, although the induction fold was much lower than those by other inducers. This low-efficiency induction of Stx-prophages by H2O2, a natural inducer of Stx-prophages, supports the hypothesis of bacterial altruism in controlling Stxs production, a strategy that assures the survival of the STEC population as a whole by sacrificing a small fraction of cells for Stxs production and release. Differential induction of Stxs among strains carrying nearly identical Stx-prophages suggests a role of host bacteria in regulating Stxs production. Our study revealed diverse Stx-prophages in STEC O145:H28 strains that were genotypically indistinguishable. Identification of a cattle isolate harboring a Stx2a-prophage associated with high virulence supports the premise that cattle, a natural reservoir of STEC, serve as a source of hypervirulent STEC strains.
Keywords: Acid challenge; Oxidative stress; Prophage induction; Shiga toxin; Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC); Stx-prophages.
Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Genomic Insight into Natural Inactivation of Shiga Toxin 2 Production in an Environmental Escherichia coli Strain Producing Shiga Toxin 1.Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2020 Sep;17(9):555-567. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2019.2767. Epub 2020 Mar 4. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2020. PMID: 32130019
-
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains from cattle as a source of the Stx2a bacteriophages present in enteroaggregative Escherichia coli O104:H4 strains.Int J Med Microbiol. 2013 Dec;303(8):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Aug 16. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 24012149
-
Comparable stx2a expression and phage production levels between Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains from human and bovine origin.Zoonoses Public Health. 2020 Feb;67(1):44-53. doi: 10.1111/zph.12653. Epub 2019 Dec 23. Zoonoses Public Health. 2020. PMID: 31868306
-
Characteristics of the Shiga-toxin-producing enteroaggregative Escherichia coli O104:H4 German outbreak strain and of STEC strains isolated in Spain.Int Microbiol. 2011 Sep;14(3):121-41. doi: 10.2436/20.1501.01.142. Int Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 22101411 Review.
-
Escherichia coli O104:H4 Pathogenesis: an Enteroaggregative E. coli/Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli Explosive Cocktail of High Virulence.Microbiol Spectr. 2014 Dec;2(6). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.EHEC-0008-2013. Microbiol Spectr. 2014. PMID: 26104460 Review.
Cited by
-
Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia albertii Strains Isolated from Wild Birds in a Major Agricultural Region in California.Microorganisms. 2023 Nov 18;11(11):2803. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112803. Microorganisms. 2023. PMID: 38004814 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial growth promoters approved in food-producing animals in South Africa induce shiga toxin-converting bacteriophages from Escherichia coli O157:H7.Gut Pathog. 2023 Dec 6;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13099-023-00590-9. Gut Pathog. 2023. PMID: 38057920 Free PMC article.
-
Diversity of Shiga toxin transducing phages in Escherichia coli O145:H28 and the different Shiga toxin 2 production levels associated with short- or long-tailed phages.Front Microbiol. 2024 Aug 6;15:1453887. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1453887. eCollection 2024. Front Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39165568 Free PMC article.
-
Human Glomerular Endothelial Cells Treated With Shiga Toxin Type 2 Activate γδ T Lymphocytes.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Nov 25;11:765941. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.765941. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 34900753 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a homogeneous time-resolved FRET (HTRF) assay for the quantification of Shiga toxin 2 produced by E. coli.PeerJ. 2021 Jul 28;9:e11871. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11871. eCollection 2021. PeerJ. 2021. PMID: 34395095 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials