Ureteral stone manipulation before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
- PMID: 3336100
- DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42281-6
Ureteral stone manipulation before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Abstract
We randomized 75 patients with solitary ureteral calculi that could not be dislodged by ureteral catheterization to receive instillation of saline, 2 per cent lidocaine viscous solution or dilute surgical lubricant before repeat stone manipulation with ureteral catheters. Of the stones irrigated with saline 76 per cent were returned to the pelvis along with 60 per cent of the lidocaine group and 48 per cent of the surgical lubricant treated stones. There was no statistical significance among the 3 groups. The success rates for upper, mid and lower ureteral stones were 80, 54 and 30 per cent, respectively. Of stones 0.5 cm. or less and between 0.6 and 1.0 cm. 77 and 72 per cent, respectively, were manipulated successfully but only 38 per cent of the stones larger than 1.0 cm. could be dislodged. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was successful in treating pelvic and ureteral stones, although higher kilovolt settings and additional shocks were necessary to fragment the ureteral stones completely. Percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteral meatotomy was required in 10 per cent of the patients with impacted ureteral stones following in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy but in only 4 per cent of the patients with stones successfully returned to the pelvis. Of the ureteral stones 17 per cent were treated with repeat extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. No patient with pelvic stones required repeat treatment. Retrograde manipulation of ureteral stones is an effective adjunctive procedure before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Similar articles
-
Management of upper ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J Urol. 1987 Oct;138(4):720-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43351-9. J Urol. 1987. PMID: 3656518
-
Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J Urol. 1987 Sep;138(3):485-90. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43236-8. J Urol. 1987. PMID: 3625845
-
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: a retrospective analysis of 417 cases.J Urol. 1988 Mar;139(3):513-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42507-9. J Urol. 1988. PMID: 3343734
-
Efficacy of tamsulosin with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for passage of renal and ureteral calculi.Ann Pharmacother. 2008 May;42(5):692-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K546. Epub 2008 Apr 15. Ann Pharmacother. 2008. PMID: 18413683 Review.
-
[Clinical experience of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with lithodiagnost M for upper urinary tract stones].Hinyokika Kiyo. 1998 Jan;44(1):1-5. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1998. PMID: 9503199 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Extracorporeal lithotripsy and combined surgical procedures in the treatment of renoureteral stone disease: our experience with 2,955 patients.World J Surg. 1989 Nov-Dec;13(6):765-74; discussion 774-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01658431. World J Surg. 1989. PMID: 2623887
-
In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones: experience with 65 patients.Int Urol Nephrol. 1992;24(1):15-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02552111. Int Urol Nephrol. 1992. PMID: 1624238
-
Developments in the ureteroscopes, techniques and accessories associated with laser lithotripsy.World J Urol. 1993;11(1):19-25. doi: 10.1007/BF00182166. World J Urol. 1993. PMID: 8098251 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of success rates and financial cost of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in situ and after manipulation for proximal ureteral stones.Urol Res. 2003 Aug;31(4):286-90. doi: 10.1007/s00240-003-0337-y. Epub 2003 Jun 24. Urol Res. 2003. PMID: 12827327 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources