Historical natural kinds and mineralogy: Systematizing contingency in the context of necessity
- PMID: 33361151
- PMCID: PMC7817175
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2015370118
Historical natural kinds and mineralogy: Systematizing contingency in the context of necessity
Abstract
The advancement of science depends upon developing classification protocols that systematize natural objects and phenomena into "natural kinds"-categorizations that are conjectured to represent genuine divisions in nature by virtue of playing central roles in the articulation of successful scientific theories. In the physical sciences, theoretically powerful classification systems, such as the periodic table, are typically time independent. Similarly, the standard classification of mineral species by the International Mineralogical Association's Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature, and Classification relies on idealized chemical composition and crystal structure, which are time-independent attributes selected on the basis of theoretical considerations from chemical theory and solid-state physics. However, when considering mineral kinds in the historical context of planetary evolution, a different, time-dependent classification scheme is warranted. We propose an "evolutionary" system of mineral classification based on recognition of the role played by minerals in the origin and development of planetary systems. Lacking a comprehensive theory of chemical evolution capable of explaining the time-dependent pattern of chemical complexification exhibited by our universe, we recommend a bootstrapping approach to mineral classification based on observations of geological field studies, astronomical observations, laboratory experiments, and analyses of natural samples and their environments. This approach holds the potential to elucidate underlying universal principles of cosmic chemical complexification.
Keywords: classification; cosmic evolution; mineral evolution; mineralogy; natural kinds.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR).Astrobiology. 2022 Jun;22(S1):S112-S164. doi: 10.1089/AST.2021.0113. Epub 2022 May 19. Astrobiology. 2022. PMID: 34904892
-
An evolutionary system of mineralogy. Part I: Stellar mineralogy (>13 to 4.6 Ga).Am Mineral. 2020 Apr 29;105(5):627-651. doi: 10.2138/am-2020-7173. Am Mineral. 2020. PMID: 33867541 Free PMC article.
-
An evolutionary system of mineralogy. Part III: Primary chondrule mineralogy (4566 to 4561 Ma).Am Mineral. 2021 Mar;106(3):325-350. doi: 10.2138/am-2020-7564. Epub 2021 Mar 1. Am Mineral. 2021. PMID: 33867542 Free PMC article.
-
The natural science underlying big history.ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:384912. doi: 10.1155/2014/384912. Epub 2014 Jun 17. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014. PMID: 25032228 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exobiology, the study of the origin, evolution and distribution of life within the context of cosmic evolution: a review.Planet Space Sci. 1995 Jan-Feb;43(1-2):189-217. doi: 10.1016/0032-0633(94)00190-3. Planet Space Sci. 1995. PMID: 11538433 Review.
Cited by
-
Cells as the first data scientists.J R Soc Interface. 2023 Feb;20(199):20220810. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0810. Epub 2023 Feb 8. J R Soc Interface. 2023. PMID: 36751931 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bird A., Tobin E., “Natural kinds” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta E. N., Ed. (Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 2015).
-
- Cleland C. E., The Quest for a Universal Theory of Life (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2019).
-
- Boyd R., Homeostasis, higher taxa, and monophyly. Philos. Sci. 77, 686–701 (2010).
-
- Lowe E. J., The Four-Category Ontology (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 2006).
-
- Laporte J., Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004).
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources