Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Feb 18;59(3):e02592-20.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.02592-20. Print 2021 Feb 18.

Laboratory Automation in the Microbiology Laboratory: an Ongoing Journey, Not a Tale?

Affiliations
Comment

Laboratory Automation in the Microbiology Laboratory: an Ongoing Journey, Not a Tale?

Stefan Zimmermann. J Clin Microbiol. .

Abstract

Clinical chemistry laboratories implemented fully automated devices decades before microbiologists started their subtle approaches to follow. Meanwhile several papers have been published about reduced time to reports, faster workflows, and increased sensitivity as results of lab automation. While the journey of automating microbiology workflows step by step was fascinating and beneficial, monetary aspects were uncommon in most publications. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, K. Culbreath, H. Piwonka, J. Korver, and M. Noorbakhsh (J Clin Microbiol 59:e01969-20, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01969-20) calculate the benefits of total lab automation in terms of cost savings and lab efficiency in a "tale of four laboratories." The authors here provide facts and solid calculations about the benefits achieved in four different-sized labs after implementation of full laboratory automation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Bourbeau PP, Ledeboer NA. 2013. Automation in clinical microbiology. J Clin Microbiol 51:1658–1665. doi:10.1128/JCM.00301-13. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Belkum A, Durand G, Peyret M, Chatellier S, Zambardi G, Schrenzel J, Shortridge D, Engelhardt A, Dunne WM, Jr. 2013. Rapid clinical bacteriology and its future impact. Ann Lab Med 33:14–27. doi:10.3343/alm.2013.33.1.14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burnham CA, Dunne WM, Jr, Greub G, Novak SM, Patel R. 2013. Automation in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin Chem 59:1696–1702. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2012.201038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Croxatto A, Prod'hom G, Faverjon F, Rochais Y, Greub G. 2016. Laboratory automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose? Clin Microbiol Infect 22:217–235. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2015.09.030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yarbrough ML, Lainhart W, McMullen AR, Anderson NW, Burnham CD. 2018. Impact of total laboratory automation on workflow and specimen processing time for culture of urine specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37:2405–2411. doi:10.1007/s10096-018-3391-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources