Furloughing
- PMID: 33362312
- PMCID: PMC7753414
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-5890.12242
Furloughing
Abstract
Over nine million jobs were furloughed in the United Kingdom during the coronavirus pandemic. Using real-time survey evidence from the UK in April and May 2020, we document which workers were most likely to be furloughed and we analyse variation in the terms on which they furloughed. We find that women were significantly more likely to be furloughed. Inequality in care responsibilities seems to have played a key role: mothers were 10 percentage points more likely than fathers to initiate the decision to be furloughed (as opposed to it being fully or mostly the employer's decision) but we find no such gender gap amongst childless workers. The prohibition of working whilst furloughed was routinely ignored, especially by men who can do a large percentage of their work tasks from home. Women were less likely to have their salary topped up beyond the 80 per cent subsidy paid for by the government. Considering the future, furloughed workers without employer-provided sick pay have a lower willingness to pay to return to work, as do those in sales and food preparation occupations. Compared with non-furloughed employees, furloughed workers are more pessimistic about keeping their job in the short to medium run and are more likely to be actively searching for a new job, even when controlling for detailed job characteristics. These results have important implications for the design of short-time work schemes and the strategy for effectively reopening the economy.
Keywords: COVID‐19; coronavirus; crisis; furlough; inequality; recession; short‐time work.
© 2020 The Authors. Fiscal Studies published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. on behalf of Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Figures








References
-
- Adams, A. (2020), ‘The gender wage gap on an online labour market: the cost of interruptions’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 14294.
-
- Adams‐Prassl, A. , Boneva, T. , Golin, M. and Rauh, C. (2020a), ‘Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: new survey evidence for the UK’, Cambridge‐INET Working Paper (10.17863/CAM.52477). - DOI
-
- Adams‐Prassl, A. , Boneva, T. , Golin, M. and Rauh, C. (2020b), ‘Work tasks that can be done from home: evidence on variation within and across occupations and industries’, IZA Discussion Paper No. 13374.
-
- Adams‐Prassl, A. , Boneva, T. , Golin, M. , and Rauh, C. (2020c), Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: evidence from real time surveys. Journal of Public Economics, vol. 189, 104245.
-
- Alon, T. , Doepke, M. , Olmstead‐Rumsey, J. , and Tertilt, M. (2020), ‘The impact of COVID‐19 on gender equality’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 26947.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous