Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;476(2243):20200528.
doi: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0528. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

A free boundary mechanobiological model of epithelial tissues

Affiliations

A free boundary mechanobiological model of epithelial tissues

Tamara A Tambyah et al. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

In this study, we couple intracellular signalling and cell-based mechanical properties to develop a novel free boundary mechanobiological model of epithelial tissue dynamics. Mechanobiological coupling is introduced at the cell level in a discrete modelling framework, and new reaction-diffusion equations are derived to describe tissue-level outcomes. The free boundary evolves as a result of the underlying biological mechanisms included in the discrete model. To demonstrate the accuracy of the continuum model, we compare numerical solutions of the discrete and continuum models for two different signalling pathways. First, we study the Rac-Rho pathway where cell- and tissue-level mechanics are directly related to intracellular signalling. Second, we study an activator-inhibitor system which gives rise to spatial and temporal patterning related to Turing patterns. In all cases, the continuum model and free boundary condition accurately reflect the cell-level processes included in the discrete model.

Keywords: cell-based model; continuum model; intracellular signalling; moving boundary problem; non-uniform growth; reaction–diffusion equations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the discrete model where mechanical cell properties, ai and ki, are functions of the family of chemical signals, Ci(t). In this schematic, we consider two diffusing chemical species where the concentration in the ith cell is Ci(t)={Ci(1)(t),Ci(2)(t)}. The diffusive flux into cell i from cells i ± 1, and the diffusive flux out of cell i into cells i ± 1, is shown. Cell i, with boundaries at xi−1(t) and xi(t), is associated with a resident point, yi(t), which determines the diffusive transport rates, Ti±(j). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Homogeneous tissue with N = 20 cells and one chemical species where Z1(C1)=0, and a = k = D1 = η = 1. Characteristicdiagrams in (a,b) illustrate the position of cell boundaries where the free boundary is highlighted in red. The colour in (a,b) represents q(x, t) and C1(x,t), respectively. In (a,b), the black horizontal lines indicate times at which q(x, t) and C1(x,t) snapshots are shown in (c,d). In (c,d), the discrete and continuum solutions are compared as the dots and solid line, respectively, for t = 0, 10, 25, 50, 75 where the arrow represents the direction of time. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
One-dimensional tissue dynamics where RhoA is coupled to mechanical cell tension. (a,c,e,g) correspond to β = 0.2 and (b,d,f ,h) relate to β = 0.3. Characteristic diagrams in (ad) illustrate the evolution of cell boundaries where the free boundary is highlighted inred. The colour in (a,b) represents C1(x,t) and q(x, t) in (c,d). The black horizontal lines indicate times at which C1(x,t) and q(x, t) snapshots are shown in (e,f ) and (g,h), respectively. In (eh), the discrete and continuum solutions are compared as the dots and solid line, respectively, for t = 0, 100, 220, 350, 430. In both systems, a=l0ϕC1p/(Ghp+C1p), k=1+0.05C1, D1 = 1, η = 1 and C1(0,t)=1 for x ∈ [0, L(t)]. Parameters: b = 0.2, γ = 1.5, n = 4, p = 4, GT = 2, l0 = 1, ϕ = 0.65, Gh = 0.4, δ = 1. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The effect of diffusion on the dynamics of the free boundary for (a) a non-oscillatory system with β = 0.2 and (b) a oscillatory system with β = 0.3. The discrete solution is shown as the dots and the continuum solution as a solid line. Parameters are as in figure 3. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Characteristic diagrams for the interaction of RhoA and Rac1 where the free boundary is highlighted in red. Panels (a,c) correspond to a non-oscillatory system, where β^=1 and (b,d)relate to an oscillatory system where β^=2.5. The colour in (a,b) denotes the concentration of RhoA and the concentration of Rac1 in (c,d). In both systems, a=l0ϕC1p/(Ghp+C1p), k=1+0.1C2, D1 = D2 = 1 and η = 1. The initial conditions are C1(0,t)=1 and C2(0,t)=0.5 for x ∈ [0, L(t)]. Parameters: b1 = b2 = 1, δ1 = δ2 = 1, n = 3, p = 4, G1T=2, G2T=3, l0 = 1, ϕ = 0.65, Gh = 0.4. Discrete and continuum solutions are compared in the electronic supplementary material, S5. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Activator–inhibitor patterns in a homogeneous tissue. In (a,c,e,g), D1 = 2 and D2 = 3 with d < dc. In (b,d,f ,h), D1 = 0.5 and D2 = 5 with d > dc. (a)–(d) shows the cellboundaries where the free boundary is highlighted in red. The colour in (a,b) represents C1(x,t) and C2(x,t) in (c,d). The black horizontal lines indicate times at which C1(x,t) and C2(x,t) snapshots are shown in (e,f ) and (g,h), respectively. In (eh), the discrete (dots) and continuum (solid line) solutions are compared at t = 0, 10, 20, 40, 90, 150. In both systems, C1(x,0)=1 and C2(x,0)=0.5 for x ∈ [0, L(t)] and a = k = η = 1. Parameters: n1 = 0.1, n2 = 1, n3 = 0.5, n4 = 1 and dc = 4.9842. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
The evolution of spatial–temporal patterns in a homogeneous tissue with Schnakenberg dynamics, where d > dc and k = 0.5. Characteristic diagrams in (a,b) illustrate the evolution of cell boundaries where the free boundary is highlighted in red. The colour in (a) represents C1(x,t) and C2(x,t)in (b). The black horizontal lines indicate times at which C1(x,t) and C2(x,t) snapshots are shown in (c) and (d), respectively. In (c,d), the discrete and continuum solutions are compared as the dots and solid line, respectively, for t = 0, 10, 20, 40, 90, 200. The initial conditions are C1(x,0)=1 and C2(x,0)=0.5 for x ∈ [0, L(t)], with a = η = 1, D1 = 0.5 and D2 = 5. Parameters: n1 = 0.1, n2 = 1, n3 = 0.5, n4 = 1 and dc = 4.9842. (Online version in colour.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fozard JA, Byrne HM, Jensen OE, King JR. 2010. Continuum approximations of individual-based models for epithelial monolayers. Math. Med. Biol. 27, 39–74. (10.1093/imammb/dqp015) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guillot C, Lecuit T. 2013. Mechanics of epithelial tissue homeostasis and morphogenesis. Science 340, 1185–1189. (10.1126/science.1235249) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xu GK, Liu Y, Li B. 2015. How do changes at the cell level affect the mechanical properties of epithelial monolayers? Soft Matter 11, 8782–8788. (10.1039/c5sm01966d) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dasbiswas K, Hannezo E, Gov NS. 2018. Theory of epithelial cell shape transitions induced by mechanoactive chemical gradients. Biophys. J. 114, 968–977. (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.022) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker RE, Parker A, Simpson MJ. 2019. A free boundary model of epithelial dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 481, 61–74. (10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.12.025) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources