Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 8:11:594446.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.594446. eCollection 2020.

Barriers and Opportunities for Implementation of Outcome-Based Spread Payments for High-Cost, One-Shot Curative Therapies

Affiliations
Review

Barriers and Opportunities for Implementation of Outcome-Based Spread Payments for High-Cost, One-Shot Curative Therapies

Sissel Michelsen et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: The challenging market access of high-cost one-time curative therapies has inspired the development of alternative reimbursement structures, such as outcome-based spread payments, to mitigate their unaffordability and answer remaining uncertainties. This study aimed to provide a broad overview of barriers and possible opportunities for the practical implementation of outcome-based spread payments for the reimbursement of one-shot therapies in European healthcare systems. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed investigating published literature and publicly available documents to identify barriers and implementation opportunities for both spreading payments and for implementing outcome-based agreements. Data was analyzed via qualitative content analysis by extracting data with a reporting template. Results: A total of 1,503 publications were screened and 174 were included. Main identified barriers for the implementation of spread payments are reaching an agreement on financial terms while considering 12-months budget cycles and the possible violation of corresponding international accounting rules. Furthermore, outcome correction of payments is currently hindered by the need for additional data collection, the lack of clear governance structures and the resulting administrative burden and cost. The use of spread payments adjusted by population- or individual-level data collected within automated registries and overseen by a governance committee and external advisory board may alleviate several barriers and may support the reimbursement of highly innovative therapies. Conclusion: High-cost advanced therapy medicinal products pose a substantial affordability challenge on healthcare systems worldwide. Outcome-based spread payments may mitigate the initial budget impact and alleviate existing uncertainties; however, their effective implementation still faces several barriers and will be facilitated by realizing the required organizational changes.

Keywords: advanced therapy medicinal product; affordability; annuity; curative therapy; managed entry agreement; outcome-based agreement; pay-for-performance; spread payment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SS has provided advice to Novartis about the design of a managed entry agreement for an advanced therapy medicinal product. VW has led a Pfizer-sponsored Belgian national Round Table gathering business and societal perspectives on high-priced gene therapies. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA diagram of the literature search and inclusion of publications.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Proposed governance structure for the implementation of outcome-based spread payments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abou-El-Enein M., Elsanhoury A., Reinke P. (2016). Overcoming challenges facing advanced therapies in the EU market. Cell Stem Cell 19 (3), 293–297. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.08.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adamski J., Godman B., Ofierska-Sujkowska G., Osinska B., Herholz H., Wendykowska K., et al. (2010). Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers. BMC Health Services Res. 10, 153 10.1186/1472-6963-10-153 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alliance for Regenerative Medicine (2019). Getting ready: recommendations for timely access to advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) in Europe.
    1. AMCP (2017). AMCP partnership Forum: advancing value-based contracting. J. Manag. Care Spec. Pharm. 23(11), 1096–1102. 10.18553/jmcp.2017.17342 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. AMCP (2019). AMCP partnership forum designing benefits and payment models for innovative high-investment medications. J. Manag. Care Spec. Pharm. 25 (2), 156–162. 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.2.156 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources