Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 8:11:600000.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.600000. eCollection 2020.

CD86 Is a Selective CD28 Ligand Supporting FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cell Homeostasis in the Presence of High Levels of CTLA-4

Affiliations

CD86 Is a Selective CD28 Ligand Supporting FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cell Homeostasis in the Presence of High Levels of CTLA-4

Neil Halliday et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

CD80 and CD86 are expressed on antigen presenting cells and are required to engage their shared receptor, CD28, for the costimulation of CD4 T cells. It is unclear why two stimulatory ligands with overlapping roles have evolved. CD80 and CD86 also bind the regulatory molecule CTLA-4. We explored the role of CD80 and CD86 in the homeostasis and proliferation of CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg), which constitutively express high levels of CTLA-4 yet are critically dependent upon CD28 signals. We observed that CD86 was the dominant ligand for Treg proliferation, survival, and maintenance of a regulatory phenotype, with higher expression of CTLA-4, ICOS, and OX40. We also explored whether CD80-CD28 interactions were specifically compromised by CTLA-4 and found that antibody blockade, clinical deficiency of CTLA-4 and CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of CTLA-4 all improved Treg survival following CD80 stimulation. Taken together, our data suggest that CD86 is the dominant costimulatory ligand for Treg homeostasis, despite its lower affinity for CD28, because CD80-CD28 interactions are selectively impaired by the high levels of CTLA-4. These data suggest a cell intrinsic role for CTLA-4 in regulating CD28 costimulation by direct competition for CD80, and indicate that that CD80 and CD86 have discrete roles in CD28 costimulation of CD4 T cells in the presence of high levels of CTLA-4.

Keywords: CD28; CD80; CD86; CTLA-4; costimulation; homeostasis; regulatory T cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treg selectively proliferate in response to CD86 costimulation. (A–D) CTV labelled total memory CD4 T cells isolated from healthy donors were cultured for 5 days with CHO-CD80, CHO-CD86, or untransduced CHO (no costimulation), at a ratio of 10 T cells to one CHO cell, with 0.5 μg/ml anti-human-CD3. (A) representative proliferation traces and (B) division indices of FoxP3+ T cells are shown. (C) proliferation traces and (D) division indices of FoxP3- conventional memory CD4 T cells (19 independent experiments). (E, F) purified Treg isolated from healthy donors were cultured with CHO-CD80, CHO-CD86, or untransduced CHO cells, at 10:1 ratio for 5 days, with 0.5 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 with increasing additional IL2. (E) representative Treg Ki67 expression. (F) percentage of Ki76+ Treg after 5 days (three independent experiments). Statistical significance of Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests: ns p>0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001 using One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (B, D) and two-way ANOVA (F).
Figure 2
Figure 2
CD86-CD28 interactions drive accumulation of Treg. CTV labelled total memory CD4 T cells isolated from healthy donors were cultured for 5 days with (A) CHO-CD80, CHO-CD86 or untransduced CHO (no costimulation), at a ratio of 10 T cells to one CHO cell, with 0.5 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 or B) CHO-FcR at 2.5:1 ratio with 1 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 or anti-human-CD28. (A, B) Frequency of FoxP3+ amongst divided T cells (24 independent experiments). (C) absolute number of FoxP3+ cells after stimulation (under same conditions as A) (eight independent experiments). Purified Treg isolated from healthy donors were cultured with CHO-CD80, CHO-CD86 or untransduced CHO cells, at 10:1 ratio for 5 days, with 0.5 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 with 12.5 IU/ml IL2. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots demonstrate greater viability of Treg after 5 days with CD86. (E) shows the total number of Treg as a % of the starting population (six independent experiments). (F) CTV labeled total memory CD4 T cells isolated from healthy donors were cultured for 5 days with CHO-CD86 at 10:1 ratio with 0.5 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 and 1 μg/ml anti-human-CD28. Representative plots and graph demonstrate reduced frequency of FoxP3+ cells amongst divided T cells with blockade of CD28 (four independent experiments). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests (A–D) and paired t-test (E): *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CD86-CD28 costimulation enhances expression of CD25, CTLA-4, OX40 and ICOS. CTV labelled total memory CD4 T cells isolated from healthy donors were cultured for 5 days with CHO-CD80, CHO-CD86 or untransduced CHO (no costimulation), at a ratio of 10 T cells to one CHO cell, with 0.5 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 or with CHO-FcR at 2.5:1 ratio with 1 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 or anti-human-CD28. After 5 days levels of (A, B) ICOS, (C) OX40, (D) CTLA4, (E) CD25 and (F) PD1 in divided CD4+FoxP3+ T cells were assessed by flow cytometry. (A) representative flow cytometry plots showing ICOS expression. (B–F) aggregate data from 22 independent experiments. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests: *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CD86-CD28 costimulation from human model APCs enhances T cell proliferation and expression of CTLA-4 and ICOS. CTV labelled total memory CD4 T cells isolated from healthy donors were cultured for 5 days with DG75-CD80, DG75-CD86, or untransduced DG75 (no costimulation), at a ratio of 1:1 T cells to DG75, with 0.5 μg/ml anti-human-CD3. After 5 days proliferation was assessed by CTV dilution. (A) representative proliferation traces of FoxP3+ cells following costimulation with CD86 or CD80. (B) FoxP3+ T cell division indices, (C) ICOS and (D) CTLA4 expression following costimulation with CD80 or CD86. Data from four independent experiments. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests: *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Treg phenotype is dependent upon persistent CD86 costimulation. CTV labelled total memory CD4 T cells isolated from healthy donors were cultured for 5 days with CHO-CD80, CHO-CD-86, or untransduced CHO (no costimulation), at a ratio of 10 T cells to one CHO cell, with 0.5 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 and the addition of anti-CD80 or anti-CD86 48 h. (A) representative proliferation traces of FoxP3+ T cells following blockade of CD80 or CD86 after 48 h of stimulation. (B) frequency of FoxP3+ amongst divided CD4 T cells following addition of anti-CD80 or anti-CD86 antibodies after 48 h of culture. (C) representative flow cytometry plots of showing ICOS expression after 5 days in divided CD4 T cells following the addition of anti-CD80 or anti-CD86 antibodies after 48 h of culture. Aggregate data for the expression of (D) ICOS, (E) OX40, (F) CTLA4 in divided CD4+FoxP3+ve T cells. Three independent experiments.
Figure 6
Figure 6
CTLA4 prevents Treg from receiving costimulation from CD80. Purified Treg isolated from healthy donors were cultured with CHO-CD80, CHO-D86, at 10:1 ratio for 5 days, with 0.5 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 and 12.5 IU/ml IL2 with anti-CTLA4 antibody. (A, B) cytometry plots demonstrate survival of Treg following costimulation with CD80 with- and without anti-CTLA4 antibodies and (C, D) similarly with CD86 costimulation. Representative plots and aggregate data from four independent experiments. (E) Total memory CD4 T cells were isolated from a healthy donor, a patient with LRBA deficiency (patient 1) and a patient CTLA4 deficiency (patient 2). T cells were stimulated for 16 h with 2:1 T cells: anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 coated activator beads and CTLA4 and FoxP3 expression assessed by flow cytometry, demonstrating CTLA4 deficiency in both CD4+FoxP3+ and CD4+FoxP3- T cells. (F, G) CTV labeled total memory CD4 T cells, isolated from patients 1 and 2 and a healthy donor, were stimulated at 10:1 ratio with CHO-CD80, CHO-CD86, or untransduced CHO (no costimulation) with 0.5 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 (F), or at 2.5:1 with CHO-FcR and 1 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 or anti-human-CD28 antibodies (G) for 5 days. Graphs illustrate the frequency of FoxP3+ cells among the divided CD4 T cells. (H, I) Treg were purified from healthy donors and underwent CTLA-4 deletion by CRISPR and were then cultured 10:1 with CHO-CD80, CHO-CD86, or untransduced CHO (no costimulation) and 0.5 μg/ml anti-human-CD3 for 5 days. (H) demonstrates CTLA4 levels in CRISPR/Cas9 treated and untreated cells after 5 days costimulation. (I) Histograms demonstrating ICOS levels following either CD86 or CD80 costimulation of CTLA4-deleted or untreated, CTLA4-replete Treg (representative plot of two independent experiments). Paired t-test: *p ≤ 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Viola A, Lanzavecchia A. T cell activation determined by T cell receptor number and tunable thresholds. Science (1996) 273(5271):104–6. 10.1126/science.273.5271.104 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harding FA, McArthur JG, Gross JA, Raulet DH, Allison JP. CD28-mediated signalling co-stimulates murine T cells and prevents induction of anergy in T-cell clones. Nature (1992) 356(6370):607–9. 10.1038/356607a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Esensten JH, Helou YA, Chopra G, Weiss A, Bluestone JA. CD28 Costimulation: From Mechanism to Therapy. Immunity (2016) 44(5):973–88. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.04.020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hansen JD, Du Pasquier L, Lefranc MP, Lopez V, Benmansour A, Boudinot P. The B7 family of immunoregulatory receptors: a comparative and evolutionary perspective. Mol Immunol (2009) 46(3):457–72. 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.10.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Collins M, Ling V, Carreno BM. The B7 family of immune-regulatory ligands. Genome Biol (2005) 6(6):223. 10.1186/gb-2005-6-6-223 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types