Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 1;10(6):699-706.
doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1007. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Effect of Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) Thickness on Dose Reduction and Image Quality as Gonad Shield

Zahroh F  1   2 , Anam C  3 , Sutanto H  3   4 , Irdawati Y  1   2 , Arifin Z  1 , Kartikasari Y  5
Affiliations

Effect of Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) Thickness on Dose Reduction and Image Quality as Gonad Shield

Zahroh F et al. J Biomed Phys Eng. .

Abstract

Background: Some organs in the body are sensitive to radiation such as eyes, breast, and gonads. Protection of sensitive organs against radiation is necessary. Recently, many sensitive organ shields have been developed from different materials.

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the dose reduction and image quality from implementation of Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) as an alternative gonad shield in digital radiography (DR).

Material and methods: In this experimental study, the SR-Pb gonad shields with various thicknesses of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm were synthesized. This study used the Pb percentage of 5 wt%. An anthropomorphic phantom was used in abdomen plain examinations. The results obtained from the use of the SR-Pb was compared with standard gonad shield, i.e. lead apron. To measure the dose reduction, the Piranha detector was used. The image quality assessment was evaluated with the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).

Results: This study showed the dose reduction was significant for all SR-Pb thicknesses, and incrementally increased with the increase of the SR-Pb thickness. The minimum and maximum of dose reduction were 22.8% for 2 mm and 66.9% for 10 mm SR-Pb, respectively.

Conclusion: Compared to the reference image without gonad shield, the SNR and CNR do not significantly change. Hence, the SR-Pb is probably to be used as an alternative gonad shield.

Keywords: Gonads; Imaging; Lead; Radiation Protection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Research setting using a PBU-50 anthropomorphic phantom for anterior-posterior projection
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regions of interests (ROIs) positions for evaluation of the Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) gonad shield in the abdominal image. The ROIs were placed at the left and right ovaries (represented by ROI number 1, 2, 3, and 4). The fifth ROI was for background area.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The radiation dose of the Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) for various thicknesses and lead gonad shield.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of abdominal images between: (a) Using 6 mm Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb), and (b) using lead gonad shield.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) The mean pixel value of the region of interest (ROI) (right and left ovaries) by using the Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb), (b) the different organ-background pixel value of the ROI (right and left ovaries) by using the SR-Pb, and (c) the noise value of the ROI (right and left ovaries).
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) The contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of the regions of interests (ROIs) (right and left ovaries) using the SR-Pb and lead gonad shield, and (b) the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the ROIs (right and left ovaries) using the Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) and lead gonad shield
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Indonesian Ministry of Healthy. Indonesia Basic Health Research (RISKESDAS). Publication of Indonesian Ministry of Health; 2018. Available from: http://labdata.litbang.depkes.go.id/menu-download .
    1. GBD Mortality and Caused of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age–sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):117–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2. [ PMC Free Article ] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1–332. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marsh R M, Silosky M. Patient Shielding in Diagnostic Imaging: Discontinuing a Legacy Practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(4):755–7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20508. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dauer L T, Casciotta K A, Erdi Y E, Rothenberg L N. Radiation dose reduction at a price: the effectiveness of a male gonadal shield during helical CT scans. BMC Med Imaging. 2007;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-7-5. [ PMC Free Article ] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources