Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID-19
- PMID: 33364386
- PMCID: PMC7752039
- DOI: 10.1002/lio2.482
Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID-19
Abstract
Objectives: At the end of 2019, SARS-CoV-2 was identified, the one responsible for the COVID-19 disease. Between a 5.1% and a 98% of COVID-19 patients present some form of alteration in their sense of smell. The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic yield of the smell dysfunction as screening tool for COVID-19.
Methods: Cross-sectional, observational, and pro-elective study was performed in a tertiary care hospital from May 25th to June 30th, 2020. One hundred and thirty-nine patients were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were collected from anamnesis. A Self-Perception Questionnaire and psychophysical olfactory test (POT) were applied to all participants. The presence of SARS-CoV2, was detected by RT-PCR methods.
Results: 51.7% of patients were SARS-CoV-2 positive. A sensitivity of 50% was obtained for the self-perception questionnaire as a screening tool for SARS-CoV2, with a specificity of 80.59%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was of 73.46%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was of 60%. The POT as a screening tool had a PPV of 82.35%, a NPV of 52.45%, a LR+ of 4.34, a LR- 0.84. The combination of anosmia (according to the POT) plus cough and asthenia got an OR of 8.25 for the SARS CoV-2 infection.
Conclusion: There is a strong association between olfactory dysfunction and COVID-19. However, it is not really efficient in the screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection and thus, they should not be considered as a single diagnostic instrument.
Level of evidence: 4.
Keywords: COVID‐19; biomarker; olfaction; olfactory disorders; olfactory test.
© 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Frequency and predictive validity of olfactory and taste dysfunction in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.Med Clin (Barc). 2021 Jun 25;156(12):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Jan 28. Med Clin (Barc). 2021. PMID: 33775400 Free PMC article. English, Spanish.
-
Diagnostic Value of Patient-Reported and Clinically Tested Olfactory Dysfunction in a Population Screened for COVID-19.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Mar 1;147(3):271-279. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.5074. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021. PMID: 33410887 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive Value of Sudden Olfactory Loss in the Diagnosis of COVID-19.ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2020;82(4):175-180. doi: 10.1159/000509143. Epub 2020 Jun 11. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2020. PMID: 32526759 Free PMC article.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 23;2(2):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5:CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. PMID: 33620086 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Anosmia as a presenting symptom of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers - A systematic review of the literature, case series, and recommendations for clinical assessment and management.Rhinology. 2020 Aug 1;58(4):394-399. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.189. Rhinology. 2020. PMID: 32386285
Cited by
-
Self-reported olfactory and gustatory dysfunction and psychophysical testing in screening for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 May;12(5):744-756. doi: 10.1002/alr.22923. Epub 2021 Dec 6. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022. PMID: 34725952 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction with the Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cells. 2023 Jan 28;12(3):430. doi: 10.3390/cells12030430. Cells. 2023. PMID: 36766771 Free PMC article.
-
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and assessment of epidemiologic determinants in Portuguese municipal workers.Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022 Jun 8;35(3):297-307. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01878. Epub 2022 Feb 7. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022. PMID: 35142298 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of olfactory recovery after COVID-19: cross-sectional study.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;281(9):4827-4834. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08646-5. Epub 2024 Apr 19. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38641737 Free PMC article.
-
Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions in SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review.Brain Behav Immun Health. 2021 Aug;15:100268. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100268. Epub 2021 May 18. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2021. PMID: 34027497 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization . Report of the WHO‐China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mis.... Accessed July 21, 2020.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous