Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 10:34:106639.
doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106639. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Protocol for life cycle assessment modeling of US fruit and vegetable supply chains- cases of processed potato and tomato products

Affiliations

Protocol for life cycle assessment modeling of US fruit and vegetable supply chains- cases of processed potato and tomato products

Ranjan Parajuli et al. Data Brief. .

Erratum in

Abstract

This article elaborates on the life cycle assessment (LCA) protocol designed for formulating the life cycle inventories (LCIs) of fruit and vegetable (F&V) supply chains. As a set of case studies, it presents the LCI data of the processed vegetable products, (a) potato: chips, frozen-fries, and dehydrated flakes, and (b) tomato-pasta sauce. The data can support to undertake life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of food commodities in a "cradle to grave" approach. An integrated F&V supply chain LCA model is constructed, which combined three components of the supply chain: farming system, post-harvest system (processing until the consumption) and bio-waste handling system. We have used numbers of crop models to calculate the crop yields, crop nutrient uptake, and irrigation water requirements, which are largely influenced by the local agro-climatic parameters of the selected crop reporting districts (CRDs) of the United States. For the farming system, LCI information, as shown in the data are averaged from the respective CRDs. LCI data for the post-harvest stages are based on available information from the relevant processing plants and the engineering estimates. The article also briefly presents the assumptions made for evaluating future crop production scenarios. Future scenarios integrate the impact of climate change on the future productivity and evaluate the effect of adaptation measures and technological advancement on the crop yield. The provided data are important to understand the characteristics of the food supply chain, and their relationships with the life cycle environmental impacts. The data can also support to formulate potential environmental mitigation and adaptation measures in the food supply chain mainly to cope with the adverse impact of climate change.

Keywords: Fruits and vegetables; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle inventory; Processed products; Sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have or could be perceived to have influenced the work reported in this article.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
The integrated LCA F&V supply chain model, showing the three components: Farming system model, Postharvest system model, and Biowaste handling model. Warehouse/storage is only considered for the potato supply chain.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Overall schematic description of F&V supply chains, explicitly showing the Background and Foreground systems. Processing potatoes are assumed to be stored at the processor.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Mass flow balance for the fryer. Mass of materials (n) are shown in Table A-3. Method based on . Mass flow rate per hour of the raw materials in the fryer: 1 = oil input, ṁ2 = oil return, 3 = fines removal, ṁ4 = air inflow, 5 = frying vapors, 6 = raw potato input, 7 = fried potatoes output. Masses are shown in Appendices 9,10.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parajuli R., Matlock M.D., Thoma G. Cradle to grave environmental impact evaluation of the consumption of potato and tomato products. Sci. Total Environ. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143662. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thornton, P., Lipper, L., 2014. How does climate change alter agricultural strategies to support food security? IFPRI Discussion Paper 01340. 1–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2423763
    1. Bindi M., Fibbi L., Miglietta F. Free Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): II. Growth and quality of grape and wine in response to elevated CO2 concentrations. Eur. J. Agron. 2001;14:145–155. doi: 10.1016/s1161-0301(00)00092-7. - DOI
    1. Parajuli R., Thoma G., Matlock M.D. Environmental sustainability of fruit and vegetable production supply chains in the face of climate change: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. AFSI . Agriculture & Food Systems Institute and the University of Florida; 2020. Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chains.https://foodsystems.org/what-we-do/nutrition/fruit-vegetable-supply-chains/ (Accessed Jun 30, 2020)

LinkOut - more resources