Post-operative pain following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: insights from the BRUISE CONTROL trials
- PMID: 33367623
- PMCID: PMC8139821
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa349
Post-operative pain following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: insights from the BRUISE CONTROL trials
Abstract
Aims: Post-operative pain following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) insertion is associated with patient dissatisfaction, emotional distress, and emergency department visits. We sought to identify factors associated with post-operative pain and develop a prediction score for post-operative pain.
Methods and results: All patients from the BRUISE CONTROL-1 and 2 trials were included in this analysis. A validated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the severity of pain related to CIED implant procedures. Patients were asked to grade the most severe post-operative pain, average post-operative pain, and pain on the day of the first post-operative clinic. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of significant post-operative pain and to develop a pain-prediction score. A total of 1308 patients were included. Multivariable regression analysis found that the presence of post-operative clinically significant haematoma {CSH; P value < 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 3.82 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.37-6.16]}, de novo CIED implantation [P value < 0.001; OR 1.90 (95% CI: 1.47-2.46)], female sex [P value < 0.001; OR 1.61 (95% CI: 1.22-2.12)], younger age [<65 years; P value < 0.001; OR 1.54 (95% CI: 1.14-2.10)], and lower body mass index [<20 kg/m2; P value < 0.05; OR 2.05 (95% CI: 0.98-4.28)] demonstrated strong and independent associations with increased post-operative pain. An 11-point post-operative pain prediction score was developed using the data.
Conclusion: Our study has identified multiple predictors of post-operative pain after CIED insertion. We have developed a prediction score for post-operative pain that can be used to identify individuals at risk of experiencing significant post-operative pain.
Keywords: Predictors of post-operative pain; BRUISE CONTROL trials; Cardiac implantable electronic device implantation; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Pacemaker; Pain prediction score.
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Adverse clinical events during the first 24 h of bedrest following cardiac electronic device implantation: a prospective observational study.Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023 Mar 1;22(2):175-183. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac050. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023. PMID: 35709305
-
Pocket haematoma after cardiac electronic device implantation in patients receiving antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment: a single-centre experience.Acta Cardiol. 2017 Feb;72(1):47-52. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1281539. Acta Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28597740
-
Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Surgery Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Sep;6(9):1131-1139. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.030. Epub 2020 Aug 26. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 32972548
-
Epidemiology of cardiac implantable electronic device infections: incidence and risk factors.Europace. 2021 Jun 23;23(23 Suppl 4):iv3-iv10. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab042. Europace. 2021. PMID: 34051086 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Device infections in implantable cardioverter defibrillators versus permanent pacemakers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Jul;30(7):1053-1065. doi: 10.1111/jce.13932. Epub 2019 Apr 17. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019. PMID: 30938929
Cited by
-
Intraoperative ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve blocks for cardiac implantable device procedures.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Sep;67(6):1353-1357. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01724-4. Epub 2023 Dec 18. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 38105353
-
The Practice of Deep Sedation in Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing Laboratories: Results of an Italian Survey Promoted by the AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing).J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 28;10(21):5035. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215035. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34768557 Free PMC article.
-
Pain after subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: A secondary analysis of the PRAETORIAN-DFT trial.Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Mar 31;6(6):799-807. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.03.011. eCollection 2025 Jun. Heart Rhythm O2. 2025. PMID: 40717858 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of rhomboid intercostal plane block on local anaesthesia in cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03206-8. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025. PMID: 40597579 Free PMC article.
-
Wide-awake local anesthesia during insertion of cardiac implantable electronic devices: a randomized study.Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024 Dec;20(4):461-467. doi: 10.5114/aic.2024.145170. Epub 2024 Nov 20. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024. PMID: 39896997 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bibas L, Levi M, Touchette J, Mardigyan V, Bernier M, Essebag V. et al. Implications of frailty in elderly patients with electrophysiological conditions. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2016;2:288–94. - PubMed
-
- Greenspon AJ, Patel JD, Lau E, Ochoa JA, Frisch DR, Ho RT. et al. Trends in permanent pacemaker implantation in the United States from 1993 to 2009: increasing complexity of patients and procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1540–5. - PubMed
-
- Stone ME, Salter B, Fischer A.. Perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Br J Anaesth 2011;107:i16–26. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical