Conversations and Reactions Around Severe Hypoglycaemia (CRASH): Results from the German Cohort of a Global Survey of People with Type 1 Diabetes or Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes and Caregivers
- PMID: 33368091
- DOI: 10.1055/a-1310-7963
Conversations and Reactions Around Severe Hypoglycaemia (CRASH): Results from the German Cohort of a Global Survey of People with Type 1 Diabetes or Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes and Caregivers
Abstract
Background: A global cross-sectional survey (CRASH) was designed to provide information about the experiences of people with diabetes (PWD) and their caregivers in relation to severe hypoglycaemic events.
Methods: Adults with type 1 diabetes or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes who had experienced one or more severe hypoglycaemic events within the past 3 years, and adult caregivers for such people, were recruited from medical research panels using purposive sampling. We present here results from Germany.
Results: Approximately 100 individuals in each of the four participant groups completed a 30-minute online survey. Survey results indicated that the most recent severe hypoglycaemic event made many participants feel scared (80.4%), unprepared (70.4%), and/or helpless (66.5%). Severe hypoglycaemia was discussed by healthcare professionals at every visit with only 20.2% of participants who had ever had this conversation, and 53.5% of participants indicated that their insulin regimen had not changed following their most recent event. 37.1% of PWD/people with diabetes cared for by caregivers owned a glucagon kit at the time of survey completion.
Conclusions: The survey identified areas for improvement in the prevention and management of severe hypoglycaemic events. For healthcare professionals, these include enquiring more frequently about severe hypoglycaemia and adjusting blood glucose-lowering medication after a severe hypoglycaemic event. For individuals with diabetes and their caregivers, potential improvements include ensuring availability of glucagon at all times. Changes in these areas could lead not only to improved patient wellbeing but also to reduced use of emergency services/hospitalisation and, consequently, lower healthcare costs.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Beth D Mitchell, Elisabeth Mönnig, and Beatrice Osumili are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. Beth D Mitchell and Elisabeth Mönnig are also shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. Erik Spaepen is a consultant to Eli Lilly and Company. Werner Kern, Andreas Holstein, and Frank Snoek have received personal fees from Eli Lilly and Company. Frank Snoek has also received fees from Abbott, the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation, the Dutch Medical Council for Health Research, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diabetes Care, and Sanofi. Mark Peyrot has received personal fees and non-financial support from Eli Lilly and Company, Calibra Medical., Valeritas, Novo Nordisk, and Lifescan.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
