Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov;46(8):977-985.
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718891. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

Rivaroxaban Compared to Placebo for the Treatment of Leg Superficial Vein Thrombosis: A Randomized Trial

Affiliations
Review

Rivaroxaban Compared to Placebo for the Treatment of Leg Superficial Vein Thrombosis: A Randomized Trial

Clive Kearon et al. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

The role of rivaroxaban in the treatment of leg superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) is uncertain. This article aims to determine if rivaroxaban is an effective and safe treatment for leg SVT. Patients with symptomatic leg SVT of at least 5 cm length were randomized to 45 days of rivaroxaban 10 mg daily or to placebo, and followed for a total of 90 days. Treatment failure (required a nonstudy anticoagulant; had proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism; or had surgery for SVT) at 90 days was the primary efficacy outcome. Secondary efficacy outcomes included leg pain severity, and venous disease-specific and general health-related quality of life over 90 days. Major bleeding at 90 days was the primary safety outcome. Poor enrollment led to the trial being stopped after 85 of the planned 600 patients were randomized to rivaroxaban (n = 43) or placebo (n = 42). One rivaroxaban and five placebo patients had a treatment failure by 90 days (absolute risk reduction = 9.0%, 95% confidence interval: -22 to 5.9%). Leg pain improvement did not differ at 7 (p = 0.16) or 45 days (p = 0.89), but was greater with rivaroxaban at 90 days (p = 0.011). There was no difference in venous disease-specific (p = 0.99) or general health-related (p = 0.37) quality of life over 45 days. There were no major bleeds or deaths in either group. There were no identifiable differences in efficacy or safety between rivaroxaban and placebo in patients with symptomatic SVT but comparisons were undermined by a much smaller than planned sample size (NCT1499953).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01499953.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Kearon is supported by an investigator award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and the Jack Hirsh Professorship in Thromboembolism; he has been a speaker for Bayer Inc. Dr. Carrier has received honoraria and research funding from BMS, Leo Pharma, and Pfizer, and consulting fees from Bayer, Sanofi, Pfizer, Servier, and Leo Pharma. Dr. Chu-Shu Gu has no conflicts of interest. Dr. Schulman has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Bayer, Octapharma, Sanofi, Alnylam, and Daiichi, and grant support from Boehringer Ingelheim, and Octapharma. Dr. Bates has received salary support as Eli Lilly Canada/May Cohen Chair in Women's Health at McMaster University and consulting fees from Leo Pharma. Dr. Kahn is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program; she has received advisory board fees from BMS, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Aspen. Dr. Wu has received advisory board honoraria from Leo Pharma, Pfizer, Servier; speaker's honoraria from Leo Pharma, Pfizer, BMS-Pfizer; and been a subinvestigator on trials with Bayer and Daiichi Sankyo. Drs. Kearon, Carrier, Schulman, Bates, Kahn, and Wu are investigators of the CanVECTOR Network (funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research CDT-142654). The other authors have no conflict of interest.

Associated data