Biofragmentable bowel anastomosis ring: comparative efficacy studies in dogs
- PMID: 3336869
Biofragmentable bowel anastomosis ring: comparative efficacy studies in dogs
Abstract
Three studies were conducted in a total of 178 dogs to determine the efficacy of a biofragmentable bowel anastomosis ring (BAR) composed of polyglycolic acid and 12.5% barium sulfate. Wound strength and healing of BAR, suture, and staple colonic anastomoses were compared for intervals of up to 1 year. The effect of systemic steroid treatment and BAR size on anastomotic wound strength and healing was also studied. The BARs fragmented at a mean time of 15.06 days postoperatively and were passed in the feces without injury. Wound strength was determined by measurements of the pressure required to burst the anastomosed colonic segment and measurements of the tension required to break 10 mm wide longitudinal strips of the anastomosed segment. The studies demonstrated that wound strength had progressed to a point where continued mechanical support (with sutures or staples) was no longer required by 14 days in both nontreated and steroid-treated dogs. Gross healing evaluations at 21 days and beyond showed no differences due to anastomotic method. Microscopic evaluations suggested that residual granulation tissue was less at the sites of BAR asastomoses than at sites of suture or staple anastomoses at the 1-year interval, suggesting that healing may be better with BAR than with standard methods of colon anastomosis.
Similar articles
-
Comparative surgical and colonoscopic appearance of colon anastomoses constructed with sutures, staples, and the biofragmentable anastomotic ring.Surg Endosc. 1992 Jan-Feb;6(1):18-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00591182. Surg Endosc. 1992. PMID: 1344573
-
The biofragmentable ring in intestinal surgery.Eur J Surg Suppl. 1993;(569):1-31. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1993. PMID: 7683222 Clinical Trial.
-
[Comparative experimental study of colocolic anastomosis with manual suture and biofragmentable ring].Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 1993 Oct-Dec;39(4):201-6. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 1993. PMID: 8162082 Clinical Trial. Portuguese.
-
Gastrointestinal viscerosynthesis with biofragmentable anastomosis ring.Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1992;81(3):271-5. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1992. PMID: 1333744 Review.
-
Sutureless intestinal anastomoses.Br J Surg. 1991 Nov;78(11):1291-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800781105. Br J Surg. 1991. PMID: 1760684 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative surgical and colonoscopic appearance of colon anastomoses constructed with sutures, staples, and the biofragmentable anastomotic ring.Surg Endosc. 1992 Jan-Feb;6(1):18-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00591182. Surg Endosc. 1992. PMID: 1344573
-
Comparison of bursting pressure of sutured, stapled and BAR anastomoses.Int J Colorectal Dis. 1993 Mar;8(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00341267. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1993. PMID: 8492037
-
Sutureless anastomosis using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring.Surg Today. 1995;25(9):783-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00311453. Surg Today. 1995. PMID: 8555695
-
Revisiting the biofragmentable anastomotic ring: is it safe in colonic surgery?Can J Surg. 2003 Apr;46(2):92-8. Can J Surg. 2003. PMID: 12691344 Free PMC article.
-
Murphy's Button revisited. Clinical experience with the biofragmentable anastomotic ring.Ann Surg. 1993 Jan;217(1):78-81. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199301000-00013. Ann Surg. 1993. PMID: 8424705 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources