Review of the Methodologies for Measurement of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Livestock Farming: Pig Farms as a Case of Study
- PMID: 33369510
- DOI: 10.1080/10408347.2020.1855410
Review of the Methodologies for Measurement of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Livestock Farming: Pig Farms as a Case of Study
Abstract
The global emission and accumulation of gases due to livestock farming is estimated to contribute to about 14.5% of the global warming effect due to greenhouse gases (GHG). Pig farming represents 9% of global livestock GHG emissions, without considering other activities of pork production process, such as feed production. Most of information about pig farms GHG emissions is based on theoretical calculations with not too much accuracy. Hence, there is a critical need to study the best sampling and analytical techniques (portable or not) that can be used to map their contribution to GHG emissions. The selection of the best analytical detection method becomes important for public policies on climate change, and in order to evaluate animal and manure handling practices to reduce GHG and to combat global warming. In this article, different techniques, which could be used to measure the emissions of GHG from livestock, are reviewed, showing the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, with special emphasis on those already used in studies about GHG from pig farms and those that allow the simultaneous determination of several species of gases. Open chambers equipped with photoacoustic multi-gas monitor have been the techniques most employed in intensive pig farms studies. Gas Chromatography coupled to different detectors has been only widely used in pig farms to monitor simultaneously several GHG species using previous sampling devices. However, there are no studies in the literature based on extensive pig farms. In these systems, micrometeorological techniques could be a promising strategy.
Keywords: Greenhouse gases; climate change mitigation; global warming; measurement methodology; pig farming.
Similar articles
-
Carbon emissions from smallholder pig production in China: a precise account based on farmers' survey.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(17):25651-25664. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17720-y. Epub 2021 Nov 30. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022. PMID: 34846657
-
Potential reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from pig production in China on the basis of households' pork consumption.Environ Int. 2023 Jul;177:108008. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108008. Epub 2023 Jun 3. Environ Int. 2023. PMID: 37295165
-
Analytical methods for quantifying greenhouse gas flux in animal production systems.J Anim Sci. 2016 Aug;94(8):3139-3146. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0017. J Anim Sci. 2016. PMID: 27695815
-
Quantification of methane emitted by ruminants: a review of methods.J Anim Sci. 2022 Jul 1;100(7):skac197. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac197. J Anim Sci. 2022. PMID: 35657151 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A systematic review of life-cycle GHG emissions from intensive pig farming: Accounting and mitigation.Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 10;907:168112. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168112. Epub 2023 Oct 25. Sci Total Environ. 2024. PMID: 37884131
Cited by
-
Effects of Quinoa Secondary Metabolites on In Vitro Fermentation and Gas Production.Animals (Basel). 2025 May 23;15(11):1522. doi: 10.3390/ani15111522. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40508988 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources