Effect of a comprehensive eRehabilitation intervention alongside conventional stroke rehabilitation on disability and health-related quality of life: A pre-post comparison
- PMID: 33369683
- PMCID: PMC8814840
- DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2785
Effect of a comprehensive eRehabilitation intervention alongside conventional stroke rehabilitation on disability and health-related quality of life: A pre-post comparison
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effect on disability and quality of life, of conventional rehabilitation (control group) with individualized, tailored eRehabilitation intervention alongside conventional rehabilitation (Fast@home; intervention group), for people with stroke.
Methods: Pre-post design. The intervention comprised cognitive (Braingymmer®) and physical (Telerevalidatie®/Physitrack®) exercises, activity-tracking (Activ8®) and psycho-education. Assessments were made at admission (T0) and after 3 (T3) and 6 months (T6). The primary outcome concerned disability (Stroke Impact Scale; SIS). Secondary outcomes were: health-related quality of life, fatigue, self-management, participation and physical activity. Changes in scores between T0-T3, T3-T6, and T0-T6 were compared by analysis of variance and linear mixed models.
Results: The study included 153 and 165 people with stroke in the control and intervention groups, respectively. In the intervention group, 82 (50%) people received the intervention, of whom 54 (66%) used it. Between T3 and T6, the change in scores for the SIS subscales Communication (control group/intervention group -1.7/-0.3) and Physical strength (-5.7/3.3) were significantly greater in the total intervention group (all mean differences< minimally clinically important differences). No significant differences were found for other SIS subscales or secondary outcomes, or between T0-T3 and T0-T6.
Conclusion: eRehabilitation alongside conventional stroke rehabilitation had a small positive effect on communication and physical strength on the longer term, compared to conventional rehabilitation only.
Keywords: Stroke Impact Scale; comprehensive healthcare; eHealth; eRehabilitation; patient-reported outcome measures; rehabilitation; stroke; telerehabilitation.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Comment in
-
Commentary on: Effect of a comprehensive E-rehabilitation Intervention alongside conventional stroke rehabilitation on disability and Health-Related quality of life: A Pre-Post comparison.J Rehabil Med. 2021 Jul 15;53(7):jrm00216. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2861. J Rehabil Med. 2021. PMID: 34240222 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization (WHO) . Cardiovascular diseases. (Accessed October, 2019). 2017. Available at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-disea....
-
- Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377: 1693–1702. - PubMed
-
- Ottenbacher KJ, Jannell S. The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. Arch Neurol 1993; 50: 37–44. - PubMed
-
- National Stroke Guidelines . Richtlijn Herseninfact en hersenbloeding. (Accessed 2019 Aug). 2018. Available at: https://www.zorginzicht.nl/kwaliteitsinstrumenten/acuut-herseninfarct.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical