Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Management of Diagnostic Uncertainty in Low-Resource Settings: A Case Report of Cesarean Ectopic Pregnancy in a Tertiary Hospital in Ghana
- PMID: 33370250
- PMCID: PMC7774991
- DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.927496
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Management of Diagnostic Uncertainty in Low-Resource Settings: A Case Report of Cesarean Ectopic Pregnancy in a Tertiary Hospital in Ghana
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) account for the overwhelming majority of maternal deaths worldwide. Cesarean section rates have increased globally over the last 10 years, including in LMICs, and are an important intervention to decrease neonatal and maternal mortality. However, cesarean sections also contribute to increased complications in subsequent pregnancies, including invasive placentation and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies (CSEP). Potential CSEP complications include rupture of the uterus, bladder invasion, and maternal mortality. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 35-year-old Ghanaian woman (gravidity 5, parity 3) with a positive urine pregnancy test and 2 months of amenorrhea. Ultrasound scanning demonstrated a gestational sac with a fetal pole and absent cardiac activity located in the lower uterine segment. Myometrium infiltration was present, with only 2 mm of anterior myometrium between the gestational sac and the urinary bladder. Owing to concern for CSEP with uncertain bladder invasion, a pelvic MRI was obtained for preoperative planning. Following the MRI, which demonstrated an intact bladder, the patient underwent an uncomplicated exploratory laparotomy and excision of the CSEP. CONCLUSIONS In LMICs, pelvic ultrasound continues to be the diagnostic tool of choice for CSEP. However, in cases with diagnostic uncertainty or possible bladder invasion, MRI is an additional imaging tool that can optimize preoperative planning and minimize the risk of maternal mortality and potential post-surgical complications.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures





Similar articles
-
Ectopic pregnancies in caesarean section scars: 5 years experience.Clin Imaging. 2020 Oct;66:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.037. Epub 2020 May 3. Clin Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32442857 Review.
-
Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes.Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(7):2589-99. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0472-2. Abdom Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26070747
-
Surgical management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: hysterotomy by transvaginal approach.Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):e25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.025. Epub 2011 May 7. Fertil Steril. 2011. PMID: 21550036
-
Transrectal ultrasound-guided surgical evacuation of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;35(4):481-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.7596. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20183866
-
Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Do-Not-Miss Diagnosis.Radiographics. 2024 Jul;44(7):e230199. doi: 10.1148/rg.230199. Radiographics. 2024. PMID: 38843098 Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization . Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2013. Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division; 2014.
-
- World Health Organization . Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2010. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank estimates; 2012. Unicef.
-
- Fischer M. Childbearing in Ghana: How beliefs affect care. African Diaspora ISPs. 2002:76.