Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb:121:291-306.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.020. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

The efficacy of real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback for psychiatric illness: A meta-analysis of brain and behavioral outcomes

Affiliations
Review

The efficacy of real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback for psychiatric illness: A meta-analysis of brain and behavioral outcomes

Emily Dudek et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRI-NF) has gained popularity as an experimental treatment for a variety of psychiatric illnesses. However, there has yet to be a quantitative review regarding its efficacy. Here, we present the first meta-analysis of rtfMRI-NF for psychiatric disorders, evaluating its impact on brain and behavioral outcomes. Our literature review identified 17 studies and 105 effect sizes across brain and behavioral outcomes. We find that rtfMRI-NF produces a medium-sized effect on neural activity during training (g = .59, 95 % CI [.44, .75], p < .0001), a large-sized effect after training when no neurofeedback is provided (g = .84, 95 % CI [.37, 1.31], p = .005), and small-sized effects for behavioral outcomes (symptoms g = .37, 95 % CI [.16, .58], p = .002; cognition g = .23, 95 % CI [-.33, .78], p = .288). Mixed-effects analyses revealed few moderators. Together, these data suggest a positive impact of rtfMRI-NF on brain and behavioral outcomes, although more research is needed to determine how rtfMRI-NF works, for whom, and under what circumstances.

Keywords: Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Intervention; Meta-analysis; Neurofeedback; Neuromodulation; Psychiatric illness; Psychopathology; Real-time fMRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Depiction of the rtfMRI-NF protocol with statistics from the studies included in our analysis. RtfMRI-NF software image depicts OpenNFT software.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Flow diagram of study selection following PRISMA criteria (Moher et al., 2009).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Forest plots of the brain outcomes. A) Hedges’ g effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals comparing post-training neural activity between active and control groups. B) Hedges’ g effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals comparing transfer effects between active and control groups. ACC = anterior cingulate cortex; ADHD = attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; ATL = anterior temporal lobe; BA = Brodmann area; dACC = dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; DLPFC = dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; LA = left amygdala; MDD = major depressive disorder; MPFC = medial prefrontal cortex; PFC = prefrontal cortex; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder; rIFG = right inferior frontal gyrus; SCC = subgenual cingulate cortex; SMA = supplementary motor
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest plot depicting Hedges’ g effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals comparing post-training psychiatric symptoms between active and control groups. area; SZ = schizophrenia. ADHD = attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; MDD = major depressive disorder; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder; ND = nicotine dependence; SZ = schizophrenia.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Forest plot depicting Hedges’ g effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals comparing post-training cognition between active and control groups. ADHD = attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; MDD = major depressive disorder.

References

    1. Alegria AA, Wulff M, Brinson H, Barker GJ, Norman LJ, Brandeis D, Stahl D, David AS, Taylor E, Giampietro V, & Rubia K (2017). Real-time fMRI neurofeedback in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Human Brain Mapping, 38(6), 3190–3209. 10.1002/hbm.23584 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arora S, Lawrence MA, & Klein RM (2020). The Attention Network Test Database: ADHD and Cross-Cultural Applications. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 388 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00388 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assink M, & Wibbelink CJM (2016). Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3), 154–174. 10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154 - DOI
    1. Badcock JC, & Hugdahl K (2014). A synthesis of evidence on inhibitory control and auditory hallucinations based on the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 180 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00180 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baldessarini RJ, Tondo L, & Viguera AC (1999). Discontinuing lithium maintenance treatment in bipolar disorders: Risks and implications. Bipolar Disorders, 1(1), 17–24. 10.1034/j.1399-5618.1999.10106.x - DOI - PubMed