Skin lesions of face and scalp - Classification by a market-approved convolutional neural network in comparison with 64 dermatologists
- PMID: 33370644
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.034
Skin lesions of face and scalp - Classification by a market-approved convolutional neural network in comparison with 64 dermatologists
Abstract
Background: The clinical differentiation of face and scalp lesions (FSLs) is challenging even for trained dermatologists. Studies comparing the diagnostic performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) with dermatologists in FSL are lacking.
Methods: A market-approved CNN (Moleanalyzer-Pro, FotoFinder Systems) was used for binary classifications of 100 dermoscopic images of FSL. The same lesions were used in a two-level reader study including 64 dermatologists (level I: dermoscopy only; level II: dermoscopy, clinical close-up images, textual information). Primary endpoints were the CNN's sensitivity and specificity in comparison with the dermatologists' management decisions in level II. Generalizability of the CNN results was tested by using four additional external data sets.
Results: The CNN's sensitivity, specificity and ROC AUC were 96.2% [87.0%-98.9%], 68.8% [54.7%-80.1%] and 0.929 [0.880-0.978], respectively. In level II, the dermatologists' management decisions showed a mean sensitivity of 84.2% [82.2%-86.2%] and specificity of 69.4% [66.0%-72.8%]. When fixing the CNN's specificity at the dermatologists' mean specificity (69.4%), the CNN's sensitivity (96.2% [87.0%-98.9%]) was significantly higher than that of dermatologists (84.2% [82.2%-86.2%]; p < 0.001). Dermatologists of all training levels were outperformed by the CNN (all p < 0.001). In confirmation, the CNN's accuracy (83.0%) was significantly higher than dermatologists' accuracies in level II management decisions (all p < 0.001). The CNN's performance was largely confirmed in three additional external data sets but particularly showed a reduced specificity in one Australian data set including FSL on severely sun-damaged skin.
Conclusions: When applied as an assistant system, the CNN's higher sensitivity at an equivalent specificity may result in an improved early detection of face and scalp skin cancers.
Keywords: Actinic keratosis; Basal cell carcinoma; Deep learning; Dermoscopy; Lentigo maligna; Melanoma; Moleanalyzer-pro; Neural network; Seborrheic keratosis; Skin cancer; Solar lentigo.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: A Blum received honoraria and/or travel expenses from Heine Optotechnik GmbH and FotoFinder Systems GmbH. C Fink received travel expenses from Magnosco GmbH. HA Haenssle received honoraria and/or travel expenses from companies involved in the development of devices for skin cancer screening: Scibase AB, FotoFinder Systems GmbH, Heine Optotechnik GmbH, Magnosco GmbH. P Tschandl has received honoraria from Silverchair, and an unrestricted research grant from MetaOptima Technology Inc. R Hofmann-Wellenhof received honoraria and/or travel expenses from FotoFinder Systems GmbH and is founder and shareholder of e-derm-consult GmbH. All other authors declared no conflict of interest.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical