Corticosteroids vs autologous blood injection for lateral epicondylitis: Study protocol for a cohort trial
- PMID: 33371166
- PMCID: PMC7748333
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023842
Corticosteroids vs autologous blood injection for lateral epicondylitis: Study protocol for a cohort trial
Expression of concern in
-
Expression of Concern: Study Protocols.Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Nov 7;104(45):e46330. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000046330. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025. PMID: 41204616 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: There is limited evidence to assess the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of autologous blood injections in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis patients. For this study, the aim was to compare the efficiency of corticosteroid and autologous blood injections for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis in a retrospective cohort trial in our single center.
Methods: After being approved by the institutional review committee of Chongqing General Hospital (IRB# 2018.417.C, November 9, 2018), we performed a single-center, retrospective study between November 2018 and January 2020. All participants provided written informed consent. The criteria for inclusion in our experiment are as follows: over 18 years old; with the history of at least 6 months of lateral epicondylitis; and the palpation of lateral epicondyle tenderness; visual analog scale (≥4). In the group A, the patient were injected the autologous blood. In group B, the patients were immersed with 0.5% of bupivacaine (1 ml) and local corticosteroids (2 ml) at lateral epicondyle. The outcomes were composed of a visual analog scores of subjective pain severity over the past 24 hours as the primary result; and limb function in various tasks of daily activity measured with disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand quick questionnaire scores, the maximum grip strength and the modified scores of Nirschl, as secondary results. All the results were assessed before the injection and at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the injection. For all examination, when the P value was less than .05, it would be defined to be a statistically significant difference.
Results: The results of this study would provide new information about the influence of autologous blood injections in treating the lateral epicondylitis.
Trial registration: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6263).
Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.
References
-
- Descatha A, Albo F, Leclerc A, et al. Lateral epicondylitis and physical exposure at work? A review of prospective studies and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016;68:1681–7. - PubMed
-
- Kachanathu SJ, Alenazi AM, Hafez AR, et al. Comparison of the effects of short-duration wrist joint splinting combined with physical therapy and physical therapy alone on the management of patients with lateral epicondylitis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2019;55:488–93. - PubMed
-
- Martinez-Silvestrini JA, Newcomer KL, Gay RE, et al. Chronic lateral epicondylitis: comparative effectiveness of a home exercise program including stretching alone versus stretching supplemented with eccentric or concentric strengthening. J Hand Ther 2005;18:411–9. - PubMed
-
- Akkurt HE, Kocabaş H, Yilmaz H, et al. Comparison of an epicondylitis bandage with a wrist orthosis in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2018;42:599–605. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
