Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;16(5):1072-1100.
doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12278. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

A Comprehensive Review on the Main Honey Authentication Issues: Production and Origin

Sónia Soares  1 , Joana S Amaral  1   2 , Maria Beatriz P P Oliveira  1 , Isabel Mafra  1
Affiliations

A Comprehensive Review on the Main Honey Authentication Issues: Production and Origin

Sónia Soares et al. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Honey is a highly consumed natural product, not only for its taste and nutritional value, but also for its health benefits. Owing to characteristics that are essentially or exclusively related to the specific region or particular local environment and flora, honey can be classified as a premium product generally perceived as a high-quality and valued product because of its desirable flavor and taste. Consequently, honey has been a target of adulteration through inappropriate/fraudulent production practices and mislabeling origin. Globally, authentication of honey covers 2 main aspects: the production, with main issues related to sugar syrup addition, filtration, thermal treatment, and water content; and the labeled origin (geographical and/or botanical) and "organic" provenance. This review addresses all those issues, focusing on the approaches to detect the different types of honey adulteration. Due to the complex nature of honey and to the different types of adulteration, its authentication has been challenging and prompted the development of several advanced analytical approaches. Therefore, an updated, critical, and extensive overview on the current and advanced analytical methods targeting markers of adulteration/authenticity, including nontarget fingerprint approaches will be provided. The most recent advances on molecular, chromatographic, and spectroscopic methodologies will be described, emphasizing their pros and cons for the identification of botanical and geographical origins.

Keywords: analysis; authenticity; botanical and geographical origins; honey; production.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agila A, Barringer S. 2013. Effect of adulteration versus storage on volatiles in unifloral honeys from different floral sources and locations. J Food Sci 78(2):C184-91.
    1. Ajlouni S, Sujirapinyokul, P. 2010. Hydroxymethylfurfuraldehyde and amylase contents in Australian honey. Food Chem 119(3):1000-5.
    1. Akbulut M, Özcan MM, Çoklar H. 2009. Evaluation of antioxidant activity, phenolics, mineral contents and some physicochemical properties of several pine honeys collected from Western Anatolia. Intl J Food Sci Nutr 60(7):577-89.
    1. Alda-Garcilope C, Gallego-Picó A, Bravo-Yagüe JC, Garcinuño-Martínez RM, Fernández-Hernando P. 2012. Characterization of Spanish honeys with protected designation of origin “Miel de Granada” according to their mineral content. Food Chem 135(3):1785-8.
    1. Alissandrakis E, Tarantilis PA, Harizanis PC, Polissiou M. 2005. Evaluation of four isolation techniques for honey aroma compounds. J Sci Food Agric 85(1):91-7.

LinkOut - more resources