Avoiding preselection bias in subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluations of genomically preselected animals
- PMID: 33372707
- PMCID: PMC8246977
- DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12533
Avoiding preselection bias in subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluations of genomically preselected animals
Abstract
In animal breeding, parents of the next generation are usually selected in multiple stages, and the initial stages of this selection are called preselection. Preselection reduces the information available for subsequent evaluation of preselected animals and this sometimes leads to bias. The objective of this study was to establish the minimum information required to subsequently evaluate genomically preselected animals without bias arising from preselection, with single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP). We simulated a nucleus of a breeding program in which a recent population of 15 generations was produced. In each generation, parents of the next generation were selected in a single-stage selection based on pedigree BLUP. However, in generation 15, 10% of male and 15% of female offspring were preselected on their genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). These GEBV were estimated using ssGBLUP, including the pedigree of all animals in generations 0-15, genotypes of all animals in generations 13-15 and phenotypes of all animals in generations 11-14. In subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of these preselected animals, genotypes and phenotypes from various groups of animals were excluded one after another. We found that GEBV of the preselected animals were only estimated without preselection bias when genotypes and phenotypes of all animals in generations 13 and 14 and of the preselected animals were included in the subsequent evaluation. We also found that genotypes of the animals discarded at preselection only helped in reducing preselection bias in GEBV of their preselected sibs when genotypes of their parents were absent or excluded from the subsequent evaluation. We concluded that to prevent preselection bias in subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of genomically preselected animals, information representative of the reference data used in the evaluation at preselection and genotypes and phenotypes of the preselected animals are needed in the subsequent evaluation.
Keywords: bias; genomic preselection; multi-stage selection; single-step genomic BLUP.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Similar articles
-
Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs.Genet Sel Evol. 2022 Jun 28;54(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12711-022-00727-5. Genet Sel Evol. 2022. PMID: 35764921 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.Genet Sel Evol. 2020 Jul 29;52(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00562-6. Genet Sel Evol. 2020. PMID: 32727349 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of preselected animals for scarcely recorded feed intake in pigs.J Anim Breed Genet. 2023 May;140(3):253-263. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12754. Epub 2023 Jan 13. J Anim Breed Genet. 2023. PMID: 36637041
-
Current status of genomic evaluation.J Anim Sci. 2020 Apr 1;98(4):skaa101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa101. J Anim Sci. 2020. PMID: 32267923 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.J Dairy Sci. 2022 Feb;105(2):923-939. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20293. Epub 2021 Nov 17. J Dairy Sci. 2022. PMID: 34799109 Review.
Cited by
-
The Effect of Preselection on the Level of Bias and Accuracy in a Broiler Breeder Population, a Simulation Study.J Anim Breed Genet. 2025 Jul;142(4):392-407. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12908. Epub 2024 Nov 21. J Anim Breed Genet. 2025. PMID: 39569758 Free PMC article.
-
Combined single-step evaluation of functional longevity of dairy cows including correlated traits.Genet Sel Evol. 2023 Oct 25;55(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00839-6. Genet Sel Evol. 2023. PMID: 37880580 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs.Genet Sel Evol. 2022 Jun 28;54(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12711-022-00727-5. Genet Sel Evol. 2022. PMID: 35764921 Free PMC article.
-
Integration of beef cattle international pedigree and genomic estimated breeding values into national evaluations, with an application to the Italian Limousin population.Genet Sel Evol. 2023 Jun 12;55(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00813-2. Genet Sel Evol. 2023. PMID: 37308814 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aguilar, I. , Misztal, I. , Johnson, D. L. , Legarra, A. , Tsuruta, S. , & Lawlor, T. J. (2010). Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 743–752. 10.3168/jds.2009-2730 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Árnason, T. , Albertsdóttir, E. , Fikse, W. F. , Eriksson, S. , & Sigurdsson, Á. (2012). Estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for a continuous trait subject to culling before testing. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 129, 50–59. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00941.x - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources