Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Dec 29;17(12):e1003461.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003461. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Assessing the risk of ketoacidosis due to sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors in patients with type 1 diabetes: A meta-analysis and meta-regression

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Assessing the risk of ketoacidosis due to sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors in patients with type 1 diabetes: A meta-analysis and meta-regression

Giovanni Musso et al. PLoS Med. .

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (SGLT2i) showed benefits in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), but the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) limits their use. Ability to predict DKA risk and therapeutic responses would enable appropriate patient selection for SGLT2i. We conducted a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating SGLT2i in T1DM to assess moderators of the relative risk (RR) of DKA, of glycemic (HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, continuous glucose monitoring parameters, insulin dose, and insulin sensitivity indices) and non-glycemic (body mass index (BMI), systolic BP, renal function, albuminuria, and diabetic eye disorders) efficacy, and of other safety outcomes (including hypoglycemia, infections, major adverse cardiovascular events, and death).

Methods and findings: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and other electronic sources through August 30, 2020, for RCTs comparing SGLT2i with active comparators or placebo in adult patients with T1DM. Reviewers extracted data for relevant outcomes, performed random effects meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, and multivariable meta-regression. The strength of evidence was summarized with the GRADE approach. Among 9,914 records identified, 18 placebo-controlled RCTs (7,396 participants, 50% males, mean age 42 y (range 23 to 55 y), 5 different SGLT2i evaluated), were included. Main outcome measures were effect sizes and moderators of glycemic and non-glycemic efficacy and of safety outcomes. In a multivariable meta-regression model, baseline BMI (β = 0.439 [95% CI: 0.211, 0.666], p < 0.001) and estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) (β = -0.766 [-1.276, -0.256], p = 0.001) were associated with the RR of DKA (RR: 2.81; 95% CI:1.97, 4.01; p < 0.001, R2 = 61%). A model including also treatment-related parameters (insulin dose change-to-baseline insulin sensitivity ratio and volume depletion) explained 86% of variance across studies in the risk of DKA (R2 = 86%). The association of DKA with a BMI >27 kg/m2 and with an eGDR <8.3 mg/kg/min was confirmed also in subgroup analyses. Among efficacy outcomes, the novel findings were a reduction in albuminuria (WMD: -9.91, 95% CI: -16.26, -3.55 mg/g, p = 0.002), and in RR of diabetic eye disorders (RR: 0.27[0.11, 0.67], p = 0.005) associated with SGLT2i. A SGLT2i dose-response gradient was consistently observed for main efficacy outcomes, but not for adverse events (AEs). Overall, predictors of DKA and of other AEs differed substantially from those of glycemic and non-glycemic efficacy. A limitation of our analysis was the relatively short (≤52 weeks) duration of included RCTs. The potential relevance for clinical practice needs also to be confirmed by real-world prospective studies.

Conclusions: In T1DM, the risk of DKA and main therapeutic responses to SGLT2i are modified by baseline BMI and insulin resistance, by total insulin dose reduction-to-baseline insulin sensitivity ratio, and by volume depletion, which may enable the targeted use of these drugs in patients with the greatest benefit and the lowest risk of DKA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Evidence acquisition flow diagram.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plot of comparison: SGLT2 inhibitors, outcome: incident diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Univariable meta-regression plots for statistically significant moderators of the RR of DKA: Baseline BMI and baseline HbA1c.
The radius of the points is proportional to the inverse of the SEs (i.e., larger/more precise studies are shown as larger points). BMI, body mass index; DKA, diabetic ketoacidosis; RR, risk ratio.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Univariable meta-regression plots for statistically significant moderators of the RR of DKA: Baseline eGDR and TID.
DKA, diabetic ketoacidosis; eGDR, estimated glucose disposal rate; RR, risk ratio; TID, total insulin dose.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Univariable meta-regression plots for statistically significant moderators of the RR of DKA: Change in BMI and in eGDR.
BMI, body mass index; DKA, diabetic ketoacidosis; eGDR, estimated glucose disposal rate; RR, risk ratio.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Univariable meta-regression plots for statistically significant moderators of the RR of DKA: Change in RIS and in TID (% change)-to-baseline RIS (IU/kg)−1 ratio.
DKA, diabetic ketoacidosis; RIS, relative insulin; RR, risk ratio; TID, total insulin dose.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Univariable meta-regression plots for statistically significant moderators of the RR of DKA: Volume depletion events.
DKA, diabetic ketoacidosis; RR, risk ratio.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Forest plot of comparison: SGLT2 inhibitors, outcome: HbA1c change (%).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Center for Disease Control and Prevention; http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/diabetesinfographic.pdf; accessed November 30th 2018.
    1. Patterson CC, Harjutsa lo V, Rosenbauer J, Neu A, Cinek O, Skrivarhaug T, et al. Trends and cyclical variation in the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in 26 European centres in the 25 year period 1989–2013: a multicentre prospective registration study. Diabetologia. 2019;62:408–17. 10.1007/s00125-018-4763-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW. Current state of Type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:971–8. 10.2337/dc15-0078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grempler R, Thomas L, Eckhardt M, Sauer A, Sharp DE, Bakker RA, et al. Empagliflozin, a novel selective sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor: characterisation and comparison with other SGLT-2 inhibitors. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:83–90. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01517.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolfsdorf JI, Ratner RE. SGLT Inhibitors for Type 1 Diabetes: Proceed With Extreme Caution. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:991–3. 10.2337/dci19-0008 - DOI - PubMed

Substances