Evaluation of the GERAADA score for prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection
- PMID: 33374014
- DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa455
Evaluation of the GERAADA score for prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection
Abstract
Objectives: The German Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) score to predict 30-day mortality in patients suffering from acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) was recently introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the GERAADA score's prediction corresponds with the authors' institutional results.
Methods: All consecutive AADA patients between 2010 and 2020 were included. Retrospective data collection comprised 11 preoperative parameters: age, sex, previous cardiac surgery, inotropic support at referral, resuscitation before surgery, aortic regurgitation, preoperative hemiparesis, intubation/ventilation at referral, preoperative organ malperfusion, extension of aortic dissection and location of primary entry site. Calculations of the GERAADA score were individually performed by a cardiac surgeon blinded to the study for all patients via a web-based application (https://www.dgthg.de/de/GERAADA_Score).
Results: A total of 371 AADA patients were operated at the authors' institution. The mean age was 62.7 ± 13.5 years and 233 (63%) were males. Prediction of 30-day mortality was accurate for the entire study cohort (actual vs predicted 30-day mortality: 15.1% vs 15.7%; P = 0.776) as well as for all 26 subgroups. In addition, preoperative resuscitation (P < 0.001), advanced age (P = 0.042) and other/unknown malperfusion (P = 0.032) were identified as independent risk factors.
Conclusions: The GERAADA score prediction of 30-day mortality after surgery is accurate, easily accessible due to its web-based platform and can be calculated with very basic preoperative clinical parameters. A prospective clinical trial is required to further evaluate the new GERAADA score as a useful tool to allow for improved decision-making in the emergency setting of AADA.
Keywords: Acute type A aortic dissection; Aortic surgery; Risk score.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jul 30;60(2):435-436. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab066. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33564859 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The first external validation of GERAADA score for the prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jul 30;60(2):435. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab056. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33564867 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Nezic and Tomsic and Klautz.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jul 30;60(2):436. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab076. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33585917 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Pollari et al.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Oct 22;60(4):1005-1006. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab151. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33792694 No abstract available.
-
About usefulness of GERAADA score.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Oct 22;60(4):1005. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab168. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33842936 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
