Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1988 Jan;17(1):20-4.
doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80497-9.

Lack of efficacy of 'weighted' radiographs in diagnosing acute acromioclavicular separation

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Lack of efficacy of 'weighted' radiographs in diagnosing acute acromioclavicular separation

P J Bossart et al. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Jan.

Abstract

The efficacy of "weighted" films in diagnosing grade 3 acromioclavicular (AC) sprains not evident on plain (unweighted) films was evaluated. Eighty-three pairs of radiographs, taken with and without weights, of patients with suspected AC injury were studied. The films were read in a randomized and blinded manner by a staff radiologist. Criteria for classifying AC injuries were: grade 1, less than 3 mm (or less than 50%) difference between the AC widths with a normal coracoclavicular (CC) distance; grade 2, greater than or equal to 3 mm (or greater than or equal to 50%) difference between the AC widths with a normal CC distance; and grade 3, greater than or equal to 5 mm (or greater than or equal to 50%) difference in CC distance. In only three cases (4%) did weights cause the injured CC distance to increase and thereby unmask a grade 3 injury not evident on plain films. Further evidence that weights may not reliably elucidate the degree of AC joint injury is suggested by the fact that in several cases the weights actually caused the injured and uninjured CC distance to decrease. We conclude that the use of weighted radiographs lacks efficacy in unmasking grade 3 AC sprains on radiograph and we recommend that routine use of this technique be abandoned.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources