Burden of diabetic macular oedema in patients receiving antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy in South Korea: a healthcare resource use and cost analysis
- PMID: 33376178
- PMCID: PMC7778761
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042484
Burden of diabetic macular oedema in patients receiving antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy in South Korea: a healthcare resource use and cost analysis
Abstract
Objective: To examine healthcare resource utilisation (HRU) and direct medical costs for patients with diabetic macular oedema (DME) treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in Korea by comparing with those for (1) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) without retinopathy and (2) patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with anti-VEGF.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: The Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) database from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016.
Participants: We identified 1398 patients older than 30 years of age who received anti-VEGF treatment for DME in 2015 after excluding patients who had a diagnosis of nAMD in 2015 and any cancer in the preceding year.
Main outcome measures: One-year healthcare resource use and direct medical costs of patients with DME treated with anti-VEGF.
Results: In total, 1398 patients with DME receiving anti-VEGF, 12 813 patients with DM without retinopathy and 12 222 patients with nAMD receiving anti-VEGF were identified. Hospital admissions and outpatient visits were highest in patients with DME, while the number of licensed anti-VEGF injections in those with DME was about half that of those with nAMD (2.1 vs 3.9 per patient per year). Mean 1-year medical costs were also higher in patients with DME (US$6723) than in those with DM without retinopathy (US$2687) and nAMD (US$4980). In a multivariable analysis with matched cohorts, DME was associated with 66% higher medical costs for comorbid diseases (adjusted OR (aOR), 1.66; 95% CI 1.45 to 1.90) and 50% lower anti-VEGF injections (aOR, 0.50; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.54) compared with nAMD.
Conclusions: The overall HRU and economic burden for DME treated with anti-VEGF were higher than for DM without retinopathy or for nAMD treated with anti-VEGF. Meanwhile, the lower number of licensed anti-VEGF injections compared with nAMD may reflect a potential lack of ophthalmological treatment for DME supported by the NHI in Korea.
Keywords: diabetic retinopathy; public health; vitreoretinal.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: J-YS reported receiving grants from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the National Research Foundation of Korea, and Government-wide R&D Fund for infectious disease research; and grants from pharmaceutical companies including Amgen, Pfizer, Hoffmann-La Roche, Dong-A ST and Yungjin, outside the submitted work. H-LJ, HL, DY and J-YS reported grants from Bayer, the National Research Foundation of Korea, and Government-wide R&D Fund for infectious disease research. YL is an employee of Bayer Korea. JHK is a consultant for Bayer Korea in this study. DJ has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Klein RKB, Moss SE. The epidemiology of ocular problems in diabetes mellitus.: Boston. MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991: 1–51.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical