Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 15:13:3021-3029.
doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S280682. eCollection 2020.

Estimation of Gestational Age Using Neonatal Anatomical Anthropometric Parameters in Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia

Affiliations

Estimation of Gestational Age Using Neonatal Anatomical Anthropometric Parameters in Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia

Chalachew Tiruneh. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. .

Abstract

Introduction: Estimation of gestational age is a key for the identification of a given low birth weight neonate is either preterm or growth retarded.

Objective: To estimate gestational age from neonatal anatomical anthropometric parameters in Dessie Referral Hospital, Ethiopia.

Methods: Institutional-based cross-sectional study design was employed in Dessie Referral Hospital from October 2019 to April 2020, with 424 consecutively live-born of 28-42 weeks of gestation. After considering the inclusion criteria, neonatal anthropometric parameters were measured within 3 days of birth. Foot length, hand length, mid-upper arm circumference, head circumference, crown-heel length, intermammary distance, umbilical nipple distance, and birth weight were measured and summarized using descriptive statistics, and the power of association was evaluated using correlation analysis. Regression equations of gestational age (GA) in completed weeks with anthropometric parameters were formulated using simple and multiple linear regression analysis.

Results: Except for hand length, all other neonatal anthropometric measurements were positively correlated with GA in completed weeks at p< 0.05. Anthropometric parameters individually, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and BW (birth weight) were correlated well with GA at correlation coefficient (r) of 0.406 and 0.334, respectively. Regression formula was formulated as GA (weeks) = 26.12+ [1.11×MUAC (cm)] and GA (Weeks) = 33.19 + [1.53×BW (kg)]. Multiple regression contributed correlation with GA and used for prediction of GA as GA (weeks) = 28.12 - [0.393×HL (cm)] + [1.07×BW (kg)] + [0.87×MUAC (cm)] (r= 0.458).

Conclusion: The overall relative better correlation for prediction of GA, alone and in combination, is found by combined parameters (HL, MUAC, and BW). The relatively better individual anthropometric parameter for GA assessment is MUAC. Hence, using this neonatal parameter as a prediction of gestational age, the death of neonate due to preterm can be minimized.

Keywords: Dessie Referral Hospital; anatomical parameters; gestational age; neonates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that there is no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of the study samples for each age of the woman in Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Break-up of the study sample for each gestational age in Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander GR, Tompkins ME, Petersen DJ, Hulsey TC, Mor J. Discordance between LMP-based and clinically estimated gestational age: implications for research, programs, and policy. Public Health Rep. 1995;110(4):395–402. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moller AB, Petzold M, Chou D, Say L. Early antenatal care visit: a systematic analysis of regional and global levels and trends of coverage from 1990 to 2013. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(10):977–983. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30325-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander GR, Allen MC. Conceptualization, measurement, and use of gestational age. Clinical and public health practice. J Perinatol. 1996;16(1):53–59. - PubMed
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162–2172. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Althabe F, Belizán JM, Mazzoni A, et al. Antenatal corticosteroids trial in preterm births to increase neonatal survival in developing countries: study protocol. Reprod Health. 2012;9(1):22. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-9-22 - DOI - PMC - PubMed