Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 24;17(4):403-433.
doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00556-9. eCollection 2020 Dec.

The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions

Affiliations
Review

The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions

Verena Klusmann et al. Eur J Ageing. .

Abstract

This is a review of existing self-report measures for assessing views on ageing. It provides an overview of instruments, for which basic psychometric properties are available and describes them according to the purposes for which they are suitable. Literature search resulted in the inclusion of 89 instruments which were categorised along eight dimensions. The majority of measures focus on explicit cognitions about people's own age and ageing or other (older) people. A substantial amount of tools account for the multidimensionality and multidirectionality of views on ageing, i.e. the idea that ageing is accompanied by both gains and losses in several different domains. To some extent, measures reflect that ageing is a long-term process and that views on ageing are malleable, rather than just stable traits. Cluster analysis revealed heterogeneity in instruments regarding the dimensions of Ecosystem, Balance, Stability, Dynamics, and Complexity. It becomes apparent, however, that approaches to measure views on ageing should be extended to more specifically target the implicit level as well as affective, physiological, and behavioural manifestations. Additionally, means for capturing views on ageing on the societal level and tools with a distinct time reference are needed. This is particularly important when one wants to account for the lifelong dynamics of views on ageing.

Keywords: Age stereotypes; Assessment; Review; Self-perceptions of ageing; Subjective ageing; Views on ageing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart for selection of measures based on Web of Science searches and focus groups. Note VoA = views on ageing

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alwin DF. Feeling thermometers versus 7-point scales: which are better? Sociol Method Res. 1997;25:318–340. doi: 10.1177/0049124197025003003. - DOI
    1. *Anderson K, Harwood J, Hummert ML. The grandparent-grandchild relationship: implications for models of intergenerational communication. Hum Commun Res. 2005;31:268–294. doi: 10.1093/hcr/31.2.268. - DOI
    1. †Arnhoff FN, Leon HV, Lorge I. Cross-cultural acceptance of stereotypes towards aging. J Soc Psychol. 1964;63:41–58. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1964.9922212. - DOI - PubMed
    1. †Axelrod S, Eisdorfer C. Attitudes toward old people: an empirical analysis of the stimulus-group validity of the Tuckman–Lorge questionnaire. J Gerontol. 1961;16:75–80. doi: 10.1093/geronj/16.1.75. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ayalon L, et al. A systematic review of existing ageism scales. Ageing Res Rev. 2019;54:100919. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2019.100919. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources