Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;69(4):1057-1062.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.17002. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

Changes in a Frailty Index and Association with Mortality

Affiliations

Changes in a Frailty Index and Association with Mortality

Sandra M Shi et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Although frailty status is dynamic, whether improvements in frailty predict mortality is unknown.

Objective: Describe 1-year changes in a frailty index (FI) and association with 48-month mortality.

Design: Secondary analysis of the National Health in Aging Trends Study.

Setting: Community.

Participants: Five thousand six hundred and seventy two Medicare beneficiaries 65 and older (3,267 (55.8%) females).

Measurements: A 40-item deficit accumulation FI was measured in 2011 and 2012, based on multidomain assessment including comorbidities, activities of daily living, physical tasks, cognition, and performance testing. We categorized 2011 FI into robust (FI < 0.15), pre-frail (FI = 0.15-0.24), mild frailty (FI = 0.25-0.34), and moderate to severe frailty (FI ≥ 0.35). Change in frailty was calculated as the FI change from 2011 to 2012, categorized as either absolute (>0.045 decrease, 0.015-0.045 decrease, ±0.015 change, 0.015-0.045 increase, >0.045 increase) or proportional change (>20% decrease, 5-20% decrease, ±5% change, 5-20% increase, 20% increase). We measured the association of FI change with 4-year mortality using Cox regression.

Results: From 2011 to 2012, mean FI increased by 0.02 (standard deviation 0.07), with 58.6% having an increase. Over 4 years, 1,039 participants (13.6%) died. After adjusting for age and sex, compared to stable frailty (±0.015), both absolute (>0.045) and proportional (>20%) increases in frailty were associated with higher mortality among pre-frail participants (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.45-3.79) and HR (95% CI) = 3.32 (1.76-6.26), respectively), participants with mild frailty (HR (95% CI) = 1.96 (1.35-2.85) and 2.03 (1.37-3.02)) and moderate or severe frailty (HR (95% CI) = 1.99 (1.48-2.67) and 1.94 (1.43-2.63)) but not robust participants (HR (95% CI)= 1.48 (0.86-2.54), HR (95% CI) = 1.62 (0.80-3.28)). However, decreases in FI were not significantly associated with decreased risk of mortality.

Conclusions: Increasing deficit accumulation FI over 1 year is associated with increased mortality risk. While decreasing FI occurs, we did not find evidence to support reduced mortality risk.

Keywords: change; frailty; mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Sponsor’s Role: None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Risk of mortality by 1-year change in Frailty Index (FI) and Baseline frailty status
Risk of mortality was estimated from Kaplan Meier curves and p-values were from the log rank test to compare mortality among FI change categories. Frailty categories are based on 2011 Frailty Index, separated into robust (FI<0.15), pre-frail (FI 0.15–0.24), mild frailty (FI 0.25–0.34) and moderate to severe frailty (FI ≥0.35).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Frailty categories are based on 2011 Frailty Index, separated into robust (FI<0.15), pre-frail (FI 0.15–0.24), mild frailty (FI 0.25–0.34) and moderate to severe frailty (FI ≥0.35). Cox regression models are adjusted for age and sex. Groups defined as follows for absolute vs proportional change, respectively: Stable Frailty (±0.015 or ±5%), Large Decrease (<−0.045 or <−20%), Small Decrease (−0.015–0.045 or −5–20%), Small Increase (0.015–0.045 or 5–20%), Large Increase (>0.045 or >20%).

References

    1. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A . Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. Journals Gerontol - Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(7):722–727. doi:62/7/722 [pii] - PubMed
    1. Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Prevalence and 10-Year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(4):681–687. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02764.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clegg A, Bates C, Young J, et al. Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data. Age Ageing. 2016;45(3):353–360. doi:10.1093/ageing/afw039 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mendonça N, Kingston A, Yadegarfar M, et al. Transitions between frailty states in the very old: the influence of socioeconomic status and multi-morbidity in the Newcastle 85+ cohort study. Age Ageing. 2020:1–8. doi:10.1093/ageing/afaa054 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fallah Nader; Mitnikski Arnold; Searle Samuel D.; Gahbauer Evelyne A.; Gill Thomas M.; Rockwood K Transitions in Frailty Status in Older Adults in Relation to Mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(3):524–529. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.021.Secreted - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types