Alveolar cleft bone grafting: factors affecting case prognosis
- PMID: 33377466
- PMCID: PMC7783176
- DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.6.409
Alveolar cleft bone grafting: factors affecting case prognosis
Abstract
Objectives: The goal of this retrospective study was to determine the significance and impact of several factors on the alveolar cleft bone grafting procedure.
Materials and methods: The medical records were reviewed. In addition, x-rays were checked. The size of every cleft was measured in this retrospective study. The analyzed factors included sex, age, type of cleft, size of the cleft, and the type of flap used in surgery. The patients were characterized into group A (no complications, Bergland scale 1 or 2), group B (complications or Bergland scale 3), or group C (failure cases). Statistical analysis was performed with a P-value set at 0.05.
Results: There were 32 cases in group A, 26 in group B, and 9 in group C. Multinomial logistic regression showed an association between the type of the cleft and the size of the cleft, with the presence of complications, or achieving type 3 on the Bergland scale, with odds ratios of 5.118 and 6.000, respectively. The type of cleft was related to failure with an odds ratio of 4.833. Given a small sample, statistical analysis could not be performed to evaluate the relationship between the size of the cleft and group C. Age, sex, and the type of the flap were not significant factors.
Conclusion: The cleft size of more than 10 mm and bilateral clefts were listed regarding their effect on the procedure. Clinicians should not overlook these factors. In addition, patients must be informed of any risks that are present.
Keywords: Alveolar cleft; Bilateral cleft; Cleft size; Patient’s age.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Optimization of dental status improves long-term outcome after alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015 Mar;52(2):210-8. doi: 10.1597/13-118. Epub 2014 Feb 25. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015. PMID: 24568558
-
Presurgical and postsurgical orthodontics are associated with superior secondary alveolar bone grafting outcomes.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Jun;43(5):717-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 14. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25887425
-
[Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Orofacial Cleft: A Survey of a Portuguese Tertiary Hospital].Acta Med Port. 2016 Mar;29(3):210-6. doi: 10.20344/amp.6418. Epub 2016 Mar 31. Acta Med Port. 2016. PMID: 27285097 Portuguese.
-
Optimal Timing of Alveolar Cleft Bone Grafting for Maxillary Clefts in the Cleft Palate Population.J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Sep;29(6):1551-1557. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004680. J Craniofac Surg. 2018. PMID: 29916970 Review.
-
Long-Term Stability of Alveolar Bone Graft in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Mar-Apr 01;33(2):e194-e200. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008254. J Craniofac Surg. 2022. PMID: 35385241
Cited by
-
Histological evaluation of osteogenesis using stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth seeded in polymethylmethacrylate-hydroxyapatite scaffold.J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2025 Jul 24;20(4):450-461. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2025.07.001. eCollection 2025 Aug. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40747358 Free PMC article.
-
Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients.J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Apr 30;48(2):85-93. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.2.85. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022. PMID: 35491139 Free PMC article.
-
Early Results on the Efficacy of Demineralized Bone Matrix, Bone Morphogenic Protein, and Freeze-dried Bone Chips in Alveolar Cleft Repair.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Feb 6;12(2):e5600. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005600. eCollection 2024 Feb. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 38322815 Free PMC article.
-
Stem Cell Therapy's Efficiency in Reconstructing Alveolar Clefts: A System Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Stem Cells Int. 2025 Mar 30;2025:2780065. doi: 10.1155/sci/2780065. eCollection 2025. Stem Cells Int. 2025. PMID: 40196051 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of Xenograft with Platelet-rich Fibrin versus Autogenous Bone in Alveolar Cleft Grafting.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Sep 30;12(9):e6106. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006106. eCollection 2024 Sep. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 39351181 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Souza J, Raskin S. Clinical and epidemiological study of orofacial clefts. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2013;89:137–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2013.03.010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2013.03.010 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Emeka CI, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, Butali A. A comparative study of quality of life of families with children born with cleft lip and/or palate before and after surgical treatment. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;43:247–55. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.4.247. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.4.247 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Schutte BC, Murray JC. The many faces and factors of orofacial clefts. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:1853–9. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.10.1853. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/8.10.1853 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wu C, Pan W, Feng C, Su Z, Duan Z, Zheng Q, et al. Grafting materials for alveolar cleft reconstruction: a systematic review and best-evidence synthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:345–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.08.003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.08.003 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chen GC, Sun M, Yin NB, Li HD. A novel method to calculate the volume of alveolar cleft defect before surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:342–6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004181. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004181 . - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical