Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Feb 1;7(2):271-278.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6741.

Effect of Capivasertib in Patients With an AKT1 E17K-Mutated Tumor: NCI-MATCH Subprotocol EAY131-Y Nonrandomized Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of Capivasertib in Patients With an AKT1 E17K-Mutated Tumor: NCI-MATCH Subprotocol EAY131-Y Nonrandomized Trial

Kevin Kalinsky et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Erratum in

  • Error in the Abstract.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Oncol. 2021 Nov 1;7(11):1729. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5290. JAMA Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34591077 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: In the National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial, agents targeting genetic tumor abnormalities are administered to patients. In the NCI-MATCH subprotocol EAY131-Y trial, patients with an AKT1 E17K-mutated metastatic tumor received the pan-AKT inhibitor capivasertib.

Objective: To assess the objective response rate (ORR) of capivasertib in patients with an AKT1 E17K-mutated tumor.

Design, setting, and participants: Between July 13, 2016, and August 10, 2017, patients in the NCI-MATCH trial were enrolled and assigned to the subprotocol EAY131-Y nonrandomized trial. Patients included adults with an AKT1 E17K-mutated metastatic tumor that had progressed with standard treatment, and these patients were assigned to receive capivasertib. Tumor assessments were repeated every 2 cycles. Data analysis of this evaluable population was performed from November 8, 2019, to March 12, 2020.

Interventions: The study treatment was capivasertib, 480 mg, orally twice daily for 4 days on and 3 days off weekly in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effect. If patients continued hormone therapy for metastatic breast cancer, the capivasertib dose was 400 mg.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was the ORR (ie, complete response [CR] and partial response) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, version 1.1. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, overall survival, and safety.

Results: In total, 35 evaluable and analyzable patients were included, of whom 30 were women (86%), and the median (range) age was 61 (32-73) years. The most prevalent cancers were breast (18 [51%]), including 15 patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/ERBB2-negative and 3 with triple-negative disease, and gynecologic (11 [31%]) cancers. The ORR rate was 28.6% (95% CI, 15%-46%). One patient with endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma achieved a CR and remained on therapy at 35.6 months. Patients with confirmed partial response had the following tumor types: 7 had HR-positive/ERBB2-negative breast cancer, 1 had uterine leiomyosarcoma, and 1 had oncocytic parotid gland carcinoma and continued receiving treatment at 28.8 months. Sixteen patients (46%) had stable disease as the best response, 2 (6%) had progressive disease, and 7 (20%) were not evaluable. With a median follow-up of 28.4 months, the overall 6-month PFS rate was 50% (95% CI, 35%-71%). Capivasertib was discontinued because of adverse events in 11 of 35 patients (31%). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events included hyperglycemia (8 [23%]) and rash (4 [11%]). One grade 4 hyperglycemic adverse event was reported.

Conclusions and relevance: This nonrandomized trial found that, in patients with an AKT1 E17K-mutated tumor treated with capivasertib, a clinically significant ORR was achieved, including 1 CR. Clinically meaningful activity with single-agent capivasertib was demonstrated in refractory malignant neoplasms, including rare cancers.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00700882.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Kalinsky reported receiving personal fees from Seattle Genetics, Merck, Immunomedics, Novartis, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca; receiving nonfinancial support from Immunomedics, Novartis, Incyte, Genentech, Calithera Biosciences, Acetylon, Seattle Genetics, Amgen, Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, and CyomX Therapeutics outside the submitted work; and having a spouse who was previously employed by Array Biopharma and Pfizer and is currently employed by Grail. Dr Sachdev reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Celgene, Ipsen, PUMA, Novartis, Pfizer, and Tempus outside the submitted work. Dr Mitchell reported receiving grants from Genentech, Taiho Oncology, and Exelexis that were paid to her institution during the conduct of the study; serving on the Corvus Board of Directors; and receiving personal fees from Genentech Advisory Board, Bristol Myers Squib Advisory Board, and Novartis Advisory Board outside the submitted work. Dr Zwiebel reported receiving personal fees from Boston Pharmaceuticals for part-time consulting on unrelated products outside the submitted work. Dr Gray reported receiving grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) during the conduct of the study. Dr O'Dwyer reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study. Dr Arteaga reported receiving grants from Lilly, Pfizer, and Takeda; serving in an expert advisory role to Novartis, Lilly, Immunomedics, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Oncology, AstraZeneca, and OrigiMed outside the submitted work; holding minor stock options in Y-TRAP and Provista; and serving in the Scientific Advisory Board of the Susan G. Komen Foundation. Dr Flaherty reported receiving grants from the ECOG-ACRIN during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Loxo Oncology, Clovis Oncology, Strata Oncology, Vivid Biosciences, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Kinnate, X4 Pharmaceuticals, PIC Therapeutics, Amgen, Asana Biosciences, Adaptimmune, Aeglea, Shattuck Labs, Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Apricity, Oncoceutics, Fog Pharma, Neon Therapeutics, Tvardi, xCures, Monopteros, Vibliome, Lilly, Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Takeda, Verastem, Boston Biomedical, Pierre Fabre, and Debiopharm outside the submitted work; and grants and personal fees from Sanofi and Novartis. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CONSORT Diagram for NCI MATCH Subprotocol
aReasons participants did not receive an assignment: screened outside of the subprotocol group window (n = 8), also have sequence variation excluded (n = 12), prior treatment (n = 1), and an annotation issue (n = 5). bReasons assigned participants were not enrolled: prior treatment (n = 2), deteriorating performance status (n = 3), inadequate organ function (n = 1), and reason unknown (n = 2).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Response to Capivasertib in Patients With an AKT1 E17K-Mutated Tumor
The subprotocol EAY131-Y trial included 35 eligible, evaluable, and analyzable patients. Eight patients were screened outside of the subprotocol group window, 12 had excluded mutated tumors, 1 had previous treatment, and 5 had an annotation issue. Two patients had previous treatment, 3 had deteriorating Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score, 1 had inadequate organ function, and 2 had unknown reasons. A, The waterfall plot demonstrates the best percentage change from baseline in the sum of the diameters of the target lesions for patients with follow-up target lesion measurements (n = 28). The best responses labeled below the bars demonstrate the confirmed overall response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1: complete response (CR; n = 1), partial response (PR; n = 9), stable disease (SD; n = 16), and progressive disease (PD; n = 2). Four patients are labeled as SD because of missing follow-up scans confirming PR. One patient with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC) missed cycle 2 measurements, and at cycle 4, the patient experienced a 74% reduction with a new lesion after cycle 4. Of the 3 evaluable patients with HR-positive/ERBB2-negative BC who continued hormone therapy along with capivasertib, 2 had a PR and 1 was a patient missing cycle 2 measurements. B, The swimmer plot of the objective responses from the start of treatment to disease progression is shown. At the time of the analysis, 2 patients continued on therapy. TNBC indicates triple-negative breast cancer. C and D, In the subprotocol EAY131-Y trial, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (C) and the median overall survival (OS) was 14.5 months (D). aNew lesion. bMissing follow-up scan confirming PR. cHormone therapy along with capivasertib. dReduction with a new lesion after cycle 4.

References

    1. Vivanco I, Sawyers CL. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(7):489-501. doi:10.1038/nrc839 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mundi PS, Sachdev J, McCourt C, Kalinsky K. AKT in cancer: new molecular insights and advances in drug development. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82(4):943-956. doi:10.1111/bcp.13021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carpten JD, Faber AL, Horn C, et al. . A transforming mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 in cancer. Nature. 2007;448(7152):439-444. doi:10.1038/nature05933 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stemke-Hale K, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Lluch A, et al. . An integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of PIK3CA, PTEN, and AKT mutations in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68(15):6084-6091. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6854 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khoury JD, Wang WL, Prieto VG, et al. . Validation of immunohistochemical assays for integral biomarkers in the NCI-MATCH EAY131 clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(3):521-531. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1597 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data