Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 1;90(3):362-368.
doi: 10.2319/051619-335.1.

Long-term stability of miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalization in Class II treatment

Long-term stability of miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalization in Class II treatment

Till Edward Bechtold et al. Angle Orthod. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate treatment stability of miniscrew-anchored maxillary distalization in Class II malocclusion.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included a distalization (n = 19) and a control (n = 19) group; a patient group with minor corrections served the control. Lateral cephalograms of 38 adult patients were taken before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 3-4 years after (T2) treatment. Horizontal and vertical movement and tipping of the maxillary first molars (U6) and central incisors (U1) were measured along with skeletal craniofacial parameters at three time points to compare the two groups regarding the achieved treatment effects and their stability.

Results: Total arch distalization therapy led to 4.2 mm of distal movement of U6 without distal crown tipping (0.6° of axis change) and 3.3° of occlusal plane steepening. Over an average retention period of 42 months, maxillary total arch distalization provided high stability of treatment results, showing the same amount of mesial movement (0.7 mm) as the control group.

Conclusions: In Class II treatment, miniscrew-anchored maxillary total arch distalization can provide stable distal movement of the maxillary first molars and central incisors.

Keywords: Class II malocclusion; Miniscrew anchorage; Molar distalization; Relapse; Stability; Total arch distalization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Illustration of intraoral mechanics used for the total arch distalization group.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cephalometric (A) linear and (B) angular measurements.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Schematic drawing of the changes in the distalization (left) and control (right) groups during and after distalization. Dotted, solid, and dashed lines indicate before, immediately after, and approximately 3–4 years after treatment, respectively.

References

    1. Strang RHW. The fallacy of denture expansion as a treatment procedure. Angle Orthod. 1949;19:12–17.
    1. Stöckli PW. Functional appliances and the extraction/nonextraction decision. In: Bolender CJ, Bounoure GM, Barat Y, editors. Extraction versus Nonextraction. Paris: SID Publisher; 1995. pp. 20–26.
    1. Bechtold TE, Göz GR. Einfluss standardisierter Bogenformen auf die transversale Zahnbogendimension [The influence of straight-wire appliances and prefabricated archwires on the transversal arch dimension] Kieferorthopädie. 2010;24:27–35.
    1. Jones RD, White JM. Rapid Class II molar correction with an opencoil jig. J Clin Orthod. 1992;26:661–664. - PubMed
    1. Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod. 1992;26:706–714. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources