Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Jul 1;90(4):607-618.
doi: 10.2319/102318-768.1.

Camouflage treatment for skeletal Class III patient with facial asymmetry using customized bracket based on CAD/CAM virtual orthodontic system

Case Reports

Camouflage treatment for skeletal Class III patient with facial asymmetry using customized bracket based on CAD/CAM virtual orthodontic system

Ha Na Sha et al. Angle Orthod. .

Abstract

When considering camouflage orthodontic treatment for Class III malocclusion with skeletal facial asymmetry, it is crucial to preserve the favorable compensated posterior occlusion. Once the inclination of the compensated occlusion is changed during orthodontic treatment, unstable occlusion, such as crossbite or scissor bite may occur. A 23-year-old female patient had anterior spacing with Class III malocclusion and a mandibular asymmetry. A nonsurgical approach was adopted. The treatment objectives were to establish a Class I molar relationship with compensated inclination of the posterior dentition and to correct the midline deviation. To achieve these goals, the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) orthodontic system plus customized brackets was applied, and miniscrews were used to distalize the left mandibular dentition for midline correction. The results suggested that the CAD/CAM-based customized brackets can be efficiently used in camouflage treatment to achieve a correct final occlusion.

Keywords: Camouflage treatment; Class III malocclusion; Customized bracket.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pretreatment facial and intraoral photographs.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Pretreatment models. Solid line indicates axis of the first molars.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Pretreatment radiographs: (A) lateral cephalogram; (B) posteroanterior cephalogram; (C) panoramic.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
(A) Diagnostic setup using digital models to simulate upper dentition protraction and distalization of the mandibular left segment. Pink, pretreatment; white, simulation. (B) Virtual setup and customized bracket wire combination. (C) Customized bracket combined with transfer tray.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The 0.016 × 0.022 inch stainless steel archwire was engaged in both arches. One elastic chain was placed from the mandibular right canine to a miniscrew in the left alveolar bone and one from the first molar bracket tube to a steel ligature connected to the miniscrew head in the retromolar area. The arrows point to the steel ligature.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Posttreatment facial and intraoral photographs.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Posttreatment models. Solid line, axis of the first molars.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Posttreatment radiographs: (A) lateral cephalogram; (B) posteroanterior cephalogram; (C) panoramic.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
Retention radiographs: (A) lateral cephalogram; (B) posteroanterior cephalogram; (C) panoramic.
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
Cephalometric superimposition. (A) pretreatment and posttreatment. Black, pretreatment; red, posttreatment; (B) posttreatment and retention. Black, posttreatment; red, retention.
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
(A, B) Superimposition of debonding and retention model images. (C) Occlusal force (N) and contact area (mm2) result at 18 months of retention.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahn J, Kim SJ, Lee JY, Chung CJ, Kim KH. Transverse dental compensation in relation to sagittal and transverse skeletal discrepancies in skeletal Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151:148–156. - PubMed
    1. Song HK, Son WS, Park SB, Kim SS, Kim YI. The assessment of dentoalveolar compensation in facial asymmetry individuals: integration of cone beam CT and laser scanned dental cast images. Korean J Orthod. 2010;40:373–382.
    1. Seo YJ, Chung KR, Kim SH, Nelson G. Camouflage treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion with asymmetry using a bone-borne rapid maxillary expander. Angle Orthod. 2015;85:322–334. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burstone CJ. Diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with asymmetries. Semin Orthod. 1998;4:153–164. - PubMed
    1. Kai R, Umeki D, Sekiya T, Nakamura Y. Defining the location of the dental midline is critical for oral esthetics in camouflage orthodontic treatment of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150:1028–1038. - PubMed

Publication types