Prospective study of the effects of postanal repair in neurogenic faecal incontinence
- PMID: 3337951
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800750118
Prospective study of the effects of postanal repair in neurogenic faecal incontinence
Abstract
The most important factor associated with a good result in the surgical treatment of neurogenic faecal incontinence by postanal repair is considered to be restoration of the obtuse anorectal angle. Sixteen patients (14F:2M; median age 59 years) with neurogenic faecal incontinence confirmed by a raised fibre density in the external anal sphincter underwent postanal repair. Pre- and postoperative manometric assessment was performed in 16 and radiological assessment in 12. Normal ranges for these parameters were established in age and sex matched control subjects. Continence was improved in 14 (88 per cent) patients, 6 (38 per cent) of whom regained normal continence, at a minimum of 15 months follow-up. A successful outcome was associated with no significant change in basal (pre-operative 35 (10-85) cmH2O, postoperative 44 (12-105) cmH2O; n.s.) or voluntary (pre-operative 43 (5-150) cmH2O, postoperative 32 (12-180) cmH2O; n.s.) components of anal canal pressure. There was a small but significant increase in sphincter length (pre-operative 2 (0-3) cm, postoperative 2.5 (0-3.5) cm; P less than 0.01). There was no significant change in the anorectal angle at rest (pre-operative 96 (90-110) degrees, postoperative 107 (79-118) degrees; n.s.) in the patients in whom continence was restored and five of these patients had resting anorectal angles within the normal range (75-94 degrees). Thus postanal repair need not be restricted to patients with widening of the anorectal angle since its beneficial effects do not appear to be related to reduction of this angle.
Similar articles
-
Anterior sphincter plication and levatorplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence.Br J Surg. 1989 Oct;76(10):1058-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800761024. Br J Surg. 1989. PMID: 2597950
-
Faecal incontinence: manometric and radiological changes following postanal repair.Aust N Z J Surg. 1989 Sep;59(9):697-705. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1989.tb01661.x. Aust N Z J Surg. 1989. PMID: 2783093
-
Prospective study of conservative and operative treatment for faecal incontinence.Br J Surg. 1988 Feb;75(2):101-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750204. Br J Surg. 1988. PMID: 3349291
-
Postanal repair for faecal incontinence: long-term follow-up.Aust N Z J Surg. 1997 Aug;67(8):566-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb02040.x. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997. PMID: 9287927 Review.
-
Fecal incontinence. Studies on physiology, pathophysiology and surgical treatment.Dan Med Bull. 2003 Aug;50(3):262-82. Dan Med Bull. 2003. PMID: 13677243 Review.
Cited by
-
Brachytherapy boost after chemoradiation in anal cancer: a systematic review.J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2018 Jun;10(3):246-253. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2018.76884. Epub 2018 Jun 29. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2018. PMID: 30038645 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Trends and current issues in adult fecal incontinence (FI): Towards enhancing the quality of life for FI patients.Environ Health Prev Med. 2003 Sep;8(4):107-17. doi: 10.1007/BF02897914. Environ Health Prev Med. 2003. PMID: 21432098 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of anal incontinence by an implantable prosthetic anal sphincter.Ann Surg. 1992 Apr;215(4):383-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199204000-00013. Ann Surg. 1992. PMID: 1558420 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical management for fecal incontinence.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Sep;27(3):106-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383902. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014. PMID: 25320569 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anal manometry.Int J Colorectal Dis. 1990 Aug;5(3):170-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00300413. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1990. PMID: 2212849 Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources