Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 16;47(23):e2020GL090559.
doi: 10.1029/2020GL090559. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

Detection of Coccolithophore Blooms With BioGeoChemical-Argo Floats

Affiliations

Detection of Coccolithophore Blooms With BioGeoChemical-Argo Floats

L Terrats et al. Geophys Res Lett. .

Abstract

Coccolithophores (calcifying phytoplankton) form extensive blooms in temperate and subpolar oceans as evidenced from ocean-color satellites. This study examines the potential to detect coccolithophore blooms with BioGeoChemical-Argo (BGC-Argo) floats, autonomous ocean profilers equipped with bio-optical and physicochemical sensors. We first matched float data to ocean-color satellite data of calcite concentration to select floats that sampled coccolithophore blooms. We identified two floats in the Southern Ocean, which measured the particulate beam attenuation coefficient (c p) in addition to two core BGC-Argo variables, Chlorophyll-a concentration ([Chl-a]) and the particle backscattering coefficient (b bp). We show that coccolithophore blooms can be identified from floats by distinctively high values of (1) the b bp/c p ratio, a proxy for the refractive index of suspended particles, and (2) the b bp/[Chl-a] ratio, measurable by any BGC-Argo float. The latter thus paves the way to global investigations of environmental control of coccolithophore blooms and their role in carbon export.

Keywords: BGC‐Argo floats; Emiliania huxleyi; bio‐optics; bloom detection; coccolithophores; global ocean.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Float trajectories and coccolithophore bloom occurrences. (a) Summer climatology of satellite [PIC] (2012–2018) showing the Great Calcite Belt and (b) high‐[PIC] patches in the study area. Red rectangles outline float sampling zones. Trajectories of floats 6901583 (c) and 6902738 during (d) the Period 1 of high [Chl‐a] and (e) the Period 2 of increasing [PIC]. Background maps are satellite [PIC] averaged over the duration of float operations. Red lines correspond to isolines of satellite [Chl‐a], and concurrent [Chl‐a] maps are displayed on Figure S8 in the supporting information. (f, g) Area‐averaged time series of [PIC], [Chl‐a] and %PIC for both sampling zones, i.e., (f) is the time series for the area shown in (c) and (g) for (d)/(e). Vertical red lines indicate periods sampled by floats, and the dashed line separates Periods 1 and 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Optical measurements and satellite products during the operation of float 6901583 (a–c) and 6902738 (d–f). Time series of (a,d) [PIC], %PIC, [Chl‐a], and b bp measured by satellites; (b,e) b bp, c p, and [Chl‐a] measured by floats; (c,f) b bp/[Chl‐a] and b bp/c p measured by floats. Blue bands delineate the coccolithophore bloom period identified by the satellite detection method. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from the surface average.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Optical ratios inside (blue dots) and outside (green dots) coccolithophore blooms sampled by floats 6901583 and 6902738. The dashed lines are the b bp/c p and b bp/[Chl‐a] thresholds 0.011 and 0.007 m2 mg−1, respectively, that best discriminate coccolithophore blooms from non‐bloom cases.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Detection of coccolithophore blooms with b bp/[Chl‐a] thresholds. The map reveals locations of profiles inside coccolithophore blooms detected by satellites. The background map is the summer climatology (2012–2018) of satellite [PIC] for each hemisphere. Boxplots show distributions of b bp/[Chl‐a] before, during, and after coccolithophore blooms in four temperate and subpolar regions identified with red polygons on the map, and in low‐latitudes (i.e., <35°) and Mediterranean Sea where no coccolithophore bloom was detected. Horizontal red dashed lines are the b bp/[Chl‐a] thresholds reported in Table 1. Blue lines are [PIC].

References

    1. Antoine, D. , & Morel, A. (1996). Oceanic primary production: 1. Adaptation of a spectral light‐photosynthesis model in view of application to satellite chlorophyll observations. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10(1), 43–55. 10.1029/95GB02831 - DOI
    1. Bailey, S. W. , & Werdell, P. J. (2006). A multi‐sensor approach for the on‐orbit validation of ocean color satellite data products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 102(1–2), 12–23. 10.1016/j.rse.2006.01.015 - DOI
    1. Balch, W. M. , Drapeau, D. T. , Bowler, B. C. , Lyczskowski, E. , Booth, E. S. , & Alley, D. (2011). The contribution of coccolithophores to the optical and inorganic carbon budgets during the Southern Ocean gas exchange experiment: New evidence in support of the “Great Calcite Belt” hypothesis. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, C00F06 10.1029/2011JC006941 - DOI
    1. Balch, W. M. , Gordon, H. R. , Bowler, B. C. , Drapeau, D. T. , & Booth, E. S. (2005). Calcium carbonate measurements in the surface global ocean based on moderate‐resolution imaging spectroradiometer data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, C07001 10.1029/2004JC002560 - DOI
    1. Balch, W. M. , Bates, N. R. , Lam, P. J. , Twining, B. S. , Rosengard, S. Z. , Bowler, B. C. , Drapeau, D. T. , Garley, R. , Lubelczyk, L. C. , Mitchell, C. , & Rauschenberg, S. (2016). Factors regulating the Great Calcite Belt in the Southern Ocean and its biogeochemical significance. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 30, 1124–1144. 10.1002/2016GB005414 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources