Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;81(6):673-679.
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694968. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

Seizure Risk following Open and Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches for Intradural Skull Base Tumors

Affiliations

Seizure Risk following Open and Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches for Intradural Skull Base Tumors

Ezequiel Goldschmidt et al. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives The incidence of seizures following a craniotomy for tumor removal varies between 15 and 20%. There has been increased use of endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) for a variety of intracranial lesions due to its more direct approach to these pathologies. However, the incidence of postoperative seizures in this population is not well described. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing EEA or open craniotomy for resection of a cranial base tumor between July 2007 and June 2014. Patients were included if they underwent an EEA for an intradural skull base lesion. Positive cases were defined by electroencephalograms and clinical findings. Patients who underwent a craniotomy to remove extra-axial skull base tumors were analyzed in the same fashion. Results Of the 577 patients treated with an EEA for intradural tumors, 4 experienced a postoperative seizure (incidence 0.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.002-0.02). Over the same period, 481 patients underwent a craniotomy for a skull base lesion of which 27 (5.3%, 95% CI: 0.03-0.08) experienced a seizure after surgery. The odds ratio for EEA was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.05-0.35). Both populations were different in terms of age, gender, tumor histology, and location. Conclusion This study is the largest series looking at seizure incidence after EEA for intracranial lesions. Seizures are a rare occurrence following uncomplicated endonasal approaches. This must be tempered by selection bias, as there are inherent differences in which patients are treated with either approach that influence the likelihood of seizures.

Keywords: craniotomy; endonasal endoscopic approach; seizures; skull base tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Dr. Gardner reports personal fees from SPIWay LLC, outside the submitted work. Dr. Snyderman reports personal fees from SPIWay LLC, outside the submitted work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dasenbrock H H, Yan S C, Smith T R. Readmission after craniotomy for tumor: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(04):551–562. - PubMed
    1. Pulman J, Greenhalgh J, Marson A G. Antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for post-craniotomy seizures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(02):CD007286. - PubMed
    1. Lockney D T, Vaziri S, Walch F. Prophylactic antiepileptic drug use in patients with brain tumors undergoing craniotomy. World Neurosurg. 2017;98:28–33. - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh J, Weston J, Dundar Y, Nevitt S J, Marson A G. Antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for postcraniotomy seizures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD007286. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu A S, Trinh V T, Suki D. A prospective randomized trial of perioperative seizure prophylaxis in patients with intraparenchymal brain tumors. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(04):873–883. - PMC - PubMed