Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 14:8:597661.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.597661. eCollection 2020.

Stem Cell Mechanobiology and the Role of Biomaterials in Governing Mechanotransduction and Matrix Production for Tissue Regeneration

Affiliations
Review

Stem Cell Mechanobiology and the Role of Biomaterials in Governing Mechanotransduction and Matrix Production for Tissue Regeneration

S M Naqvi et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Mechanobiology has underpinned many scientific advances in understanding how biophysical and biomechanical cues regulate cell behavior by identifying mechanosensitive proteins and specific signaling pathways within the cell that govern the production of proteins necessary for cell-based tissue regeneration. It is now evident that biophysical and biomechanical stimuli are as crucial for regulating stem cell behavior as biochemical stimuli. Despite this, the influence of the biophysical and biomechanical environment presented by biomaterials is less widely accounted for in stem cell-based tissue regeneration studies. This Review focuses on key studies in the field of stem cell mechanobiology, which have uncovered how matrix properties of biomaterial substrates and 3D scaffolds regulate stem cell migration, self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation, and activation of specific biological responses. First, we provide a primer of stem cell biology and mechanobiology in isolation. This is followed by a critical review of key experimental and computational studies, which have unveiled critical information regarding the importance of the biophysical and biomechanical cues for stem cell biology. This review aims to provide an informed understanding of the intrinsic role that physical and mechanical stimulation play in regulating stem cell behavior so that researchers may design strategies that recapitulate the critical cues and develop effective regenerative medicine approaches.

Keywords: 2D substrate stiffness; 3D biomaterial stiffness; biomechanical stimuli; biophysical stimuli; computational modeling; regenerative medicine; tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Eggs that have been fertilized in vitro give rise to embryos which give rise to embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are adult cells that are genetically reprogrammed to a pluripotent stem cell–like state. Adult stem cells are undifferentiated cells, found among specialized cells in specific areas of adult tissues (called a “stem cell niche”). Pluripotent (ESCs and iPSCs) cells give rise to all cell types of the body and multipotent (adult stem cells) cells give rise to all cell types of a particular tissue or organ.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Cellular mechanosensory proteins: The internal cytoskeleton transmits mechanical stimuli from the extracellular environment to the cell nucleus. This stimulus is mediated by transmembrane proteins located at focal adhesions, which bind to ECM ligands but also intracellular proteins. Cadherins connect the cytoskeleton of adjacent cells and thus enable cells to transmit force from one to another, and also allow movement of components within the plasma membrane. Primary cilia sense fluid flow, pressure and strain and activate ion flux through channels on the ciliary axoneme, which govern intracellular signaling. Other membrane proteins can also be regulated through mechanical shear and strain.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A) The mechanical properties of PEG hydrogels were altered by varying precursor polymer concentration. (B) Velocity of skeletal muscle stem cells cultured on soft PEG hydrogel (12 kPa) or rigid cell culture plastic (106 kPa). (C) Number of skeletal muscle stems (normalized) cultured on soft (12 kPa) or rigid substrate (106 kPa) over the course of 70 h. Adapted with permission from Gilbert et al. (2010). ***p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
(A) Human ASC migration and (B) speed/velocity on 2.9 kPa/mm and 8.2-kPa/mm stiffness gradient fibronectin-coated PA gels over 72 h. (C) Average speed (xy) and x and y velocity over 72 h of hASCs on low (0.5 kPa/mm), middle (1.7 kPa/mm), and high (2.9 kPa/mm) stiffness gradient hydrogels. Adapted with permission from Hadden et al. (2017). *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
(A) Computational model of 3D cell with 240 fiber orientations in 3D space within a representative volume element (RVE). (B,C) High affinity and low affinity integrins involved in the formation of focal adhesions between a cell containing stress fibers and a ligand-coated substrate (Ronan et al., 2014).

References

    1. Abdeen A. A., Lee J., Kilian K. A. (2016). Capturing extracellular matrix properties in vitro: microengineering materials to decipher cell and tissue level processes. Exp. Biol. Med. 241 930–938. 10.1177/1535370216644532 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Altmann B., Steinberg T., Giselbrecht S., Gottwald E., Tomakidi P., Bächle-Haas M., et al. (2011). Promotion of osteoblast differentiation in 3D biomaterial micro-chip arrays comprising fibronectin-coated poly(methyl methacrylate) polycarbonate. Biomaterials 32 8947–8956. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amnon B., Rajagopal K., Brown A. E., Discher D. E. (2010). How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels. J. Phys. 22:194116 10.1088/0953-8984/22/19/194116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angele P., Yoo J. U., Smith C., Mansour J., Jepsen K. J., Nerlich M., et al. (2003). Cyclic hydrostatic pressure enhances the chondrogenic phenotype of human mesenchymal progenitor cells differentiated in vitro. J. Orthop. Res. 21 451–457. 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00230-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aragona M., Panciera T., Manfrin A., Giulitti S., Michielin F., Elvassore N., et al. (2013). A mechanical checkpoint controls multicellular growth through YAP/TAZ regulation by Actin-processing factors. Cell 154 1047–1059. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.042 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources