Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun;142(3):283-292.
doi: 10.1007/s10633-020-09799-4. Epub 2020 Dec 31.

The contribution of multifocal visual evoked potentials in patients with optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis: a review

Affiliations
Review

The contribution of multifocal visual evoked potentials in patients with optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis: a review

Paraskevas Zafeiropoulos et al. Doc Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To review the evidence on the usefulness of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) test in patients with optic neuritis (ON) and/or multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods: We critically review key published evidence on the use of mfVEP in ON/MS patients and its association with other functional and structural tests.

Results: Multifocal VEP tests are useful in detecting abnormality in patients with ON/MS and monitor the progression of lesions (remyelination, atrophy). In addition, mfVEP has good correlation with conventional visual evoked potential (VEP), standard automated perimetry, optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. In patients with ON, mfVEP might be useful in predicting the risk of conversion to MS.

Keywords: Multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP); Multiple sclerosis (MS); Optic neuritis (ON).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors Paraskevas Zafeiropoulos, George Kitsos, Maria Stefaniotou and Ioannis Asproudis declare that they have no conflict of interest. Andreas Katsanos declares honoraria and congress expenses by Santen, Vianex, Laboratoires Théa, Cooper and research support from Laboratoires Théa.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, Hemmer B, Ciccarelli O. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2018;21(391):1622–1636. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30481-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toosy AT, Mason DF, Miller DH. Optic neuritis. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:83–99. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70259-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwenkenbecher P, Sarikidi A, Bönig L, Wurster U, Bronzlik P, Sühs KW, Pul R, Stangel M, Skripuletz T. Clinically isolated syndrome according to McDonald 2010: intrathecal IgG synthesis still predictive for conversion to multiple sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2061. doi: 10.3390/ijms18102061. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frohman EM, Goodin DS, Calabresi PA, et al. The utility of MRI in suspected MS: report of the therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2003;61:602–611. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000082654.99838.EF. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alshowaeir D, Yiannikas C, Garrick R, Parratt J, Barnett MH, Graham SL, Klistorner A. Latency of multifocal visual evoked potentials in nonoptic neuritis eyes of multiple sclerosis patients associated with optic radiation lesions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:3758–3764. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14571. - DOI - PubMed